I have tried to install Apache 2.2.4 as best I can on a Windows 2000 SP4
system, in the hope I could use it to serve my blog instead of the
Java-based server I've been using. I have also installed PHP 5.2.0. I
initially had problems configuring Apache to serve PHP files correctly
(execute rat
I have tried to install Apache 2.2.4 as best I can on a Windows 2000 SP4
system, in the hope I could use it to serve my blog instead of the
Java-based server I've been using. I have also installed PHP 5.2.0. I
initially had problems configuring Apache to serve PHP files correctly
(execute rather
I have tried to install Apache 2.2.4 as best I can on a Windows 2000 SP4
system, in the hope I could use it to serve my blog instead of the
Java-based server I've been using. I have also installed PHP 5.2.0. I
initially had problems configuring Apache to serve PHP files correctly
(execute rat
Mark A. Craig wrote:
>
> Does this happen to sound like a well-known problem to anyone, given the
> brief details above?
well known, no. But if you have disabled acceptex, you may also want to
turn EnableSendfile off and EnableMMap off. If this does not resolve your
issue, I'd suggest afd.sys i
William:
Thank you for the suggestion; at my current level of understanding it
would have been impossible for me to make such educated guesses. Are
there negative consequences to disabling these two features for my very
simple usage of Apache? I will test this scenario and share the results
Followup: so far those two directives(?) seem to be making a difference:
Apache has been running for six hours now with no BSODs, and there have
been plenty of hits during that time. Apache seems to be using much
more RAM than it was before, but that might simply be because I've never
seen it
On 5/2/07, Mark A. Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As an aside, does anyone know why I wind up with TWO instances of httpd
running in Windows, as reported in Task Manager? This is not uncommon,
I have other services that show up as two processes rather than one, as
well. I'm just curious why
Mark A. Craig wrote:
>
> As an aside, does anyone know why I wind up with TWO instances of httpd
> running in Windows, as reported in Task Manager?
flip on the # of threads view.
The parent process which monitors/replaces dead worker processes is about
2-4 threads.
The worker process which is s
