Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache doesnt close the socket

2006-11-24 Thread Joshua Slive
On 11/24/06, Filip Kolendo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've found on [http://www.petefreitag.com/item/505.cfm] suggestion to lower value (45 sec). For me it sounds reasonably... Is it really a serious threat to set it lower ("odd places in the code")? It is fine to set it down to a few seconds

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache doesnt close the socket

2006-11-24 Thread Filip Kolendo
Joshua Slive wrote: > On 11/23/06, Filip Kolendo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I notice strange (in my opinion erroneous and dangerous) behaviour of >> Apache; very easily can be completely locked by wrong/malicious clients. >> I think it can have something common with the situation di

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache doesnt close the socket

2006-11-23 Thread Joshua Slive
On 11/23/06, Filip Kolendo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I notice strange (in my opinion erroneous and dangerous) behaviour of Apache; very easily can be completely locked by wrong/malicious clients. I think it can have something common with the situation discussed in the thread I point belo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache doesnt close the socket

2006-11-23 Thread Filip Kolendo
Hello, I notice strange (in my opinion erroneous and dangerous) behaviour of Apache; very easily can be completely locked by wrong/malicious clients. I think it can have something common with the situation discussed in the thread I point below, although I'm not sure whether the reason is the same.