Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Defunct CGI processes

2005-11-09 Thread Marple Huckleby
Any advice at all with regards to this issue? Any more information that I can provide? steve On 11/7/05, Marple Huckleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Plain text please... My apologies, I didn't notice that gmail was sending in HTML. This type of problem is impossible to analyse without a

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Defunct CGI processes

2005-11-07 Thread Boyle Owen
disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. log? -Original Message- From: Marple Huckleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Freitag, 4. November 2005 20:15 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Defunct CGI processes I submitted this a few days ago, and have

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Defunct CGI processes

2005-11-07 Thread Marple Huckleby
Plain text please... My apologies, I didn't notice that gmail was sending in HTML. This type of problem is impossible to analyse without a huge amount of additional information. For starters: - your apache version? 1.3.34 - are the log files on NFS? No, they are stored on a local

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Defunct CGI processes

2005-11-04 Thread Marple Huckleby
I submitted this a few days ago, and have not seen it come through - my apologies if it has come through twice. I have a number of front-end web servers, which mount their DocumentRoot directory from an NFS server. Several versions ago, I began seeing defunct Perl processes (not mod_perl). I

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Defunct CGI processes

2005-11-02 Thread Marple Huckleby
I have a number of front-end web servers, which mount their DocumentRoot directory from an NFS server. Several versions ago, I began seeing defunct Perl processes (not mod_perl). I waited and upgraded with each new release, but the problem has not gone away. These servers run a relatively