[EMAIL PROTECTED] MPM prefork

2006-12-14 Thread Grant
Hello, I've started using the MPM prefork with apache2 along with these settings: StartServers5 MinSpareServers 5 MaxSpareServers 20 MaxClients 150 MaxRequestsPerChild 100 I'm happy with the results, but I'm curious about the following quote taken fro

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPM prefork

2006-12-14 Thread Joshua Slive
On 12/14/06, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does this mean apache-1.3 preforked by default? If so, why was this behavior changed for apache2? Why wouldn't I want to run MPM prefork? Yes, 1.3 is a pre-forking webserver. For a description of why you might want to change this, see http://htt

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPM prefork

2006-12-14 Thread Grant
> Does this mean apache-1.3 preforked by default? If so, why was this > behavior changed for apache2? Why wouldn't I want to run MPM prefork? Yes, 1.3 is a pre-forking webserver. For a description of why you might want to change this, see http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mpm.html and the docs

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPM prefork

2006-12-14 Thread Richard Lynch
On Thu, December 14, 2006 11:09 am, Grant wrote: > I use mod_perl and I can't use a threaded perl. Does that mean I > can't use a threaded apache2? I don't know, but I suspect your analysis is correct. mod_php also has issues with thread safety that makes MPM in anything other than pre-fork prob

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MPM prefork

2006-12-14 Thread Grant
> I use mod_perl and I can't use a threaded perl. Does that mean I > can't use a threaded apache2? I don't know, but I suspect your analysis is correct. mod_php also has issues with thread safety that makes MPM in anything other than pre-fork problematic. Actually, PHP core is probably fairly