Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_proxy problem in 2.2.4

2007-06-01 Thread Pavel Mateja
> If you don't have enough memory for the OS to maintain the important > stuff in the buffer cache, then mem_cache isn't going to help because > it will just shove other important stuff out of memory and onto disk. Yes, it is. But it's quite diffucult to explain why without detailed description o

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_proxy problem in 2.2.4

2007-05-31 Thread Joshua Slive
On 5/31/07, Pavel Mateja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But the disk cache often has better performance than the memory cache > even on a normal disk. There are two reasons for this: > > 1. The disk cache is shared between all processes, while the mem cache > must keep copies of each object for eac

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_proxy problem in 2.2.4

2007-05-31 Thread Pavel Mateja
> But the disk cache often has better performance than the memory cache > even on a normal disk. There are two reasons for this: > > 1. The disk cache is shared between all processes, while the mem cache > must keep copies of each object for each processes. > > 2. The disk cache takes full advantag

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_proxy problem in 2.2.4

2007-05-31 Thread Joshua Slive
On 5/31/07, Pavel Mateja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 31 of May 2007 15:32:43 Joshua Slive wrote: > Yes, it is likely a mod_mem_cache problem. Try using the disk cache > instead. It is better tested, and likely just as performant as the mem > cache in most circumstances. Unfortunatelly

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_proxy problem in 2.2.4

2007-05-31 Thread Pavel Mateja
On Thursday 31 of May 2007 15:32:43 Joshua Slive wrote: > Yes, it is likely a mod_mem_cache problem. Try using the disk cache > instead. It is better tested, and likely just as performant as the mem > cache in most circumstances. Unfortunatelly it's not an option for us. We have to use some sort o

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_proxy problem in 2.2.4

2007-05-31 Thread Joshua Slive
On 5/31/07, Pavel Mateja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Had anybody seen such problem? It's related with mod_cache_mem because I was uable to replicate it without mod_cache_mem compiled in. Yes, it is likely a mod_mem_cache problem. Try using the disk cache instead. It is better tested, and likely

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mod_proxy problem in 2.2.4

2007-05-31 Thread Pavel Mateja
Hey! I have problem with mod_proxy in apache 2.2.4. I got wrong data In cca 1 request of 1000 via my proxy apache. There is end of another page requested by someone else at begin of page requested by me. It's like HTTP/1.0 200 OK ..generated HTTP header - we are using UTF-8 almost everywhere.. Co