On 12/2/06, Jaqui Greenlees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not really sure what you mean by "included the
> perchild_mpm
> module", since mpm modules cannot be separately
> included like regular
> modules. They must be compiled into the server.
> A
--- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not really sure what you mean by "included the
> perchild_mpm
> module", since mpm modules cannot be separately
> included like regular
> modules. They must be compiled into the server.
> And I'm sure that
> nobody is distributing perchild as a
On 12/1/06, Jaqui Greenlees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That is odd then that most linux distros still include
perchild in the distro.
I've just spend the last couple of weeks checking out
the current releases of the biggest distros and they
all included the perchild_mpm module.
[ not the only is
--- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/1/06, arun kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Please let me know whether apache 2.2.3 will
> support perchid MPM or
> > not..
>
> No, it doesn't. In fact, no version of apache httpd
> every really
> supported the perchild
On 12/1/06, arun kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
Please let me know whether apache 2.2.3 will support perchid MPM or
not..
No, it doesn't. In fact, no version of apache httpd every really
supported the perchild mpm. It's development never got completed and
it was eventually droppe
Hi All,
Please let me know whether apache 2.2.3 will support perchid MPM or
not..
Because while installing apache 2.2.3 it's not showing me the perchid
mpm in option.
bash-3.00# ./configure --help
--with-sslc=DIR RSA SSL-C SSL/TLS toolkit
--with-ssl=DIR
