On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:27 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mandy,
>
> > I need to know if its a good idea to run webserver as
> > user 'apache', have all files in webroot owned by user
> > apache and perms 644?
>
> It's not exactly a good idea, but if you are in a situation
> where the adva
Hi Mandy,
> I need to know if its a good idea to run webserver as
> user 'apache', have all files in webroot owned by user
> apache and perms 644?
It's not exactly a good idea, but if you are in a situation
where the advantage outweighs the problems, then go ahead.
> Would this still mean t
Anyone?
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Mandy Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to know if its a good idea to run webserver as user 'apache', have
> all files in webroot owned by user apache and perms 644?
>
> Would this still mean that if server runs as apache and it has read/w
