[EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Apache Scalability

2007-11-29 Thread Tony Anecito
Hi All, I have heard a strange story about how using 1 port for Apache SSL is not a good idea for performance. I heard if you have three sites usign the same SSL port it could really slow down performance as compared to putting those sites on separate ports for SSL. Should not each site have

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Apache Scalability

2007-11-29 Thread Dragon
Tony Anecito wrote: Hi All, I have heard a strange story about how using 1 port for Apache SSL is not a good idea for performance. I heard if you have three sites usign the same SSL port it could really slow down performance as compared to putting those sites on separate ports for SSL. Should

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Apache Scalability

2007-11-29 Thread Sander Temme
On Nov 29, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: I have heard a strange story about how using 1 port for Apache SSL is not a good idea for performance. I Sounds like something for Mythbusters! heard if you have three sites usign the same SSL port it could really slow down performance as

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSL Apache Scalability

2007-11-29 Thread Tony Anecito
Thanks. I will sendthese email feedbacks to the person who mentioned it to me and make sure I heard it right. Many Thanks! -Tony --- Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 29, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: I have heard a strange story about how using 1 port for Apache