Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Streamlining Apache Modules

2008-02-25 Thread Andrew Dixon
Hi Christian, > You approach is valid, however it would be even better if you > start out with no module and then add them one after the > other until the site works as expected. This is exactly what I did, I remove all modules and then added them back in one by one until the Apache server wou

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Streamlining Apache Modules

2008-02-24 Thread Christian Folini
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:50:12PM +, Andrew Dixon wrote: > Everything still seem to work ok and as yet I've not found any side > effects. Two questions really: > > 1) Does removing the seemingly unused modules provide any benefit? > 2) Does anyone see any of the modules that I have removed as

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Streamlining Apache Modules

2008-02-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Dixon wrote: > Hi All, > > Is there any benefit to removing Apache modules that the server > doesn't appear to use? > > The list below is a list of the Apache modules that I appear to > require to run my web server: > > LoadModule access_module modules/mod_access.so > LoadModule log_config_m

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Streamlining Apache Modules

2008-02-24 Thread Andrew Dixon
Hi All, Is there any benefit to removing Apache modules that the server doesn't appear to use? The list below is a list of the Apache modules that I appear to require to run my web server: LoadModule access_module modules/mod_access.so LoadModule log_config_module modules/mod_log_config.so LoadM