Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] default mime.types does not contain "gz" - any reason why not?

2006-02-10 Thread Joshua Slive
On 2/10/06, Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings, > > I have just realised that the default version of mime.types which comes with > apache distros 1.3 & 2.0 does not contain an extension for the type > "application/x-gzip". This means that if you have a file on your site like > dow

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] default mime.types does not contain "gz" - any reason why not?

2006-02-10 Thread Nick Kew
On Friday 10 February 2006 12:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Users are not really supposed to edit the mime.types file > directly. I think this is what the AddType directive is for. Broadly speaking, yes. > # AddType allows you to add to or override the MIME configuration > # file mime.types for

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] default mime.types does not contain "gz" - any reason why not?

2006-02-10 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 13:32 > To: Apache list > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] default mime.types does not > contain "gz" - any reason why not? > > > User

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] default mime.types does not contain "gz" - any reason why not?

2006-02-10 Thread httpd2
application/x-httpd-php .js Keith In theory, theory and practice are the same; In practice they are not. On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Boyle Owen wrote: > To: Apache list From: Boyle Owen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] default > mime.types does not contain "gz" -

[EMAIL PROTECTED] default mime.types does not contain "gz" - any reason why not?

2006-02-10 Thread Boyle Owen
Greetings, I have just realised that the default version of mime.types which comes with apache distros 1.3 & 2.0 does not contain an extension for the type "application/x-gzip". This means that if you have a file on your site like download.tar.gz, it will be served with "Content-type: applicati