: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers bug?
Has anyone had experiences where mod_headers directives often fail to have
any effect?
- It is unable to modify headers, only create & modify newly added headers.
Within my .htaccess file I carried out the following simple tests.
1)
Header always
Has anyone had experiences where mod_headers directives often fail to have any
effect?
- It is unable to modify headers, only create & modify newly added headers.
Within my .htaccess file I carried out the following simple tests.
1)
Header always set MyCustomHeader myCustomValue
-- this works fi
On 8/10/07, Jeff Murch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Joshua. I found that it is nod_proxy_html v2 that is causing the
> character set problem. Version 2 only outputs UTF-8. This was corrected in 3
> to allow you to specify a character set. So, I have downloaded the source
> for 3 and compile
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 12:04 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers mapping problem
On 8/10/07, Jeff Murch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you please show me an example of how I would unconditionally rewrite
&
On 8/10/07, Jeff Murch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you please show me an example of how I would unconditionally rewrite
> the character-type header from utf-8?
>
> I am trying, and I know the syntax is more like pseudocode:
>
> RewriteEngine On
> rewriterule ^C"Content-Type: text/html;charse
-8859-1"
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 11:37 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers mapping problem
On 8/10/07, Jeff Murch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
On 8/10/07, Jeff Murch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't using RewriteCond be able to do that?
No. RewriteCond can act on request headers but not response headers
(since mod_rewrite must do rewriting before the response is written).
Joshua.
---
Wouldn't using RewriteCond be able to do that?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 11:14 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers mapping problem
On 8/
On 8/10/07, Jeff Murch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More info:
>
> It seems that none of the headers will unset...
Standard protocol-required headers like Content-Type, Connection, etc,
can't generally be manipulated with mod_headers.
mod_rewrite can manipulate content-type, but I don't think
Wrong again. SOME of the headers won't unset. Content-Type won't,
Connection won't, but Server will
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Murch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 11:07 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECT
More info:
It seems that none of the headers will unset...
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Murch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 11:06 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers mapping problem
I changed the syntax in the
10, 2007 10:44 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers mapping problem
Jeff Murch wrote:
>I am trying to map the following in my httpd.conf (for a reverse proxy):
>
>header unset "Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8"
>header add Content-
Thanks Dragon.
What if I only want it remapped when the Content-Type is UTF-8?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Dragon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 10:44 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers mapping problem
Jeff Murch wrote
Jeff Murch wrote:
I am trying to map the following in my httpd.conf (for a reverse proxy):
header unset "Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8"
header add Content-Type "Content-Type: text/html;charset=iso-8859-1"
As you can see I want to change the content type so that some of the
characters r
I am trying to map the following in my httpd.conf (for a reverse proxy):
header unset "Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8"
header add Content-Type "Content-Type: text/html;charset=iso-8859-1"
As you can see I want to change the content type so that some of the
characters render correctly. But
On 5/23/07, elwyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm running an admittedly old Apache 1.3.6 server configuration
My guess is that the line above answers your two questions below.
And so, the questions:
1. Shouldn't the header directive still be parsed via mod_headers, and
shouldn't I expec
I'm running an admittedly old Apache 1.3.6 server configuration with an
ecommerce website and recently attempted to resolve the problem
involving cookies, IE7 and P3P Compact Headers.
For any unfamiliar with the issue, IE7 browser, at the "High" privacy
setting, will only allow cookies to be
> On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:43 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:18 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > >
> > > > But what you don't want is an HTTP server.
> > >
> > > True, although http would be suitable if I could reduce the
> > unecessary
> > > bandwidth from the headers.
> >
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 15:40 +0100, Frode E. Moe wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 22:31:48 +0800, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > > Luckily, the 2.x version
> > > has been designed to support multiple protocols. See mod_echo (or
> > > mod_pop3 or mod_ftpd) for an example of how to substitute another
> > >
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:43 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:18 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> >
> > > But what you don't want is an HTTP server.
> >
> > True, although http would be suitable if I could reduce the
> unecessary
> > bandwidth from the headers.
>
> But the header
On 11/23/06, Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:18 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> But what you don't want is an HTTP server.
True, although http would be suitable if I could reduce the unecessary
bandwidth from the headers.
But the headers are an inherent part of HTT
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 22:31:48 +0800, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > Luckily, the 2.x version
> > has been designed to support multiple protocols. See mod_echo (or
> > mod_pop3 or mod_ftpd) for an example of how to substitute another
> > protocol module for the http protocol module.
>
> Does that mean
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:18 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote:
> But what you don't want is an HTTP server.
True, although http would be suitable if I could reduce the unecessary
bandwidth from the headers.
> Luckily, the 2.x version
> has been designed to support multiple protocols. See mod_echo (or
On 11/23/06, Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:32 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Why do you want to use apache (HTTP server) when you want your application
> send no headers (e.g. no HTTP response)?
Because Apache is robust, efficient, flexible, bulletproof,
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:21 +, Nick Kew wrote:
> No headers at all?
I'd like to get rid of as many as I can. But I can't seem to get rid of
any, well, except the ones I create myself.
> You can't do that in response to an HTTP/1.x
> request, because (bugs aside), Apache won't break HTTP a
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:32 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Why do you want to use apache (HTTP server) when you want your application
> send no headers (e.g. no HTTP response)?
Because Apache is robust, efficient, flexible, bulletproof, easy to
interface to virtually any database, easy to
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:28:51 +0800
Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm running Apache 2.0 on Debian Sarge.
>
> I have a non-standard application for Apache, and don't want to send
> any headers in the response.
No headers at all? You can't do that in response to an HTTP/1.x
request,
On 23.11.06 11:28, Dan Nelson wrote:
> I'm running Apache 2.0 on Debian Sarge.
>
> I have a non-standard application for Apache, and don't want to send any
> headers in the response. I thought I'd be able to do so using
> mod_headers.
Why do you want to use apache (HTTP server) when you want you
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 4:29 AM
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers
>
>
> I'm running Apache 2.0 on Debian Sarge.
>
> I have a non-standar
I'm running Apache 2.0 on Debian Sarge.
I have a non-standard application for Apache, and don't want to send any
headers in the response. I thought I'd be able to do so using
mod_headers.
I can use the 'Header' directive to add my own header, and then append
to and unset it. But using the same
30 matches
Mail list logo
