> In the context of the current state of the mem cache, yes, I do
> consider that a bad idea. The mem cache is not well tested. And in
> addition, on systems with good buffer caches, the disk cache will be
> able to share one memory/buffer cached object across all threads and
> processes and use ze
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 4:54 PM, PAILLART Frederic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Joshua,
>
> Thanks a lot for your answer.
> I was not aware that the disk cache is more performant than mem cache.
>
> I'm using worker MPM and I've configured my apache server as follow :
> ServerLimit
Hi Joshua,
Thanks a lot for your answer.
I was not aware that the disk cache is more performant than mem cache.
I'm using worker MPM and I've configured my apache server as follow :
ServerLimit 4
ThreadLimit 502
StartServers 1
MaxClients 2008
MinSpareThreads
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Frederic Paillart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using mod_mem_cache to cache iso files provided by tomcat backend
> server (using mod_http_proxy).
> During the first client download, the iso file is stored into this cache.
> If this client stops p
Hi all,
I'm using mod_mem_cache to cache iso files provided by tomcat backend
server (using mod_http_proxy).
During the first client download, the iso file is stored into this cache.
If this client stops prematurely the download, the cache contains an
incomplete part of this iso file.
Consequentl
