Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy maximum connections to a backend

2007-01-10 Thread Christian Gottschalch
have a look http://apache.ivn.cl/ may be interesting George Barnett schrieb: Hmm, That makes sense to me, although it sounds like a great way to kill a backend. Given the thread limit per processes is 64, you'd end up having almost no way of controlling connections to the backend. George

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy maximum connections to a backend

2007-01-10 Thread George Barnett
Hmm, That makes sense to me, although it sounds like a great way to kill a backend. Given the thread limit per processes is 64, you'd end up having almost no way of controlling connections to the backend. George Christian Gottschalch wrote: Hi, i think it ist per process, so if you have 1

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy maximum connections to a backend

2007-01-10 Thread Christian Gottschalch
Hi, i think it ist per process, so if you have 100 processes with max value 200 your Hard Maximum will be 2 connections, but im not shure. Documentation says (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxypass): The default for a Hard Maximum for the number of connections is th

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy maximum connections to a backend

2007-01-09 Thread George Barnett
Hi All, I've asked this on irc and it was suggested that I try asking the dev because the docs aren't clear, but I'll ask here aswell. I'm using apache httpd 2.2.3 with the event MPM to do some traffic throttling to a backend. What I have is this: First, traffic hit a default vhost with lots o