Re: [us...@httpd] Possible to use pseudo-name based SSL-connections with many SSL hosts in the background?

2009-01-18 Thread Peter Schober
* Carsten Aulbert [2009-01-18 18:35]: > Krist van Besien schrieb: > > The problem is that you are trying to work around a problem in the > > protocol. It is not a limitation of apache that you can't use > > namebased virtualhosts with ssl, it's a limitation in the protocol, > > and you will encoun

Re: [us...@httpd] Possible to use pseudo-name based SSL-connections with many SSL hosts in the background?

2009-01-18 Thread Carsten Aulbert
Hi Krist, Krist van Besien schrieb: > The problem is that you are trying to work around a problem in the > protocol. It is not a limitation of apache that you can't use > namebased virtualhosts with ssl, it's a limitation in the protocol, > and you will encounter this limitation regardless of what

Re: [us...@httpd] Possible to use pseudo-name based SSL-connections with many SSL hosts in the background?

2009-01-18 Thread Krist van Besien
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Carsten Aulbert wrote: > Hi all, > > Usually it's not possible to use name-based virtual hosts for SSL > connections since the well known chicken-egg problem (at least if I > understood the FAQ correctly). My question would be if there is some way > of "emulating"

[us...@httpd] Possible to use pseudo-name based SSL-connections with many SSL hosts in the background?

2009-01-18 Thread Carsten Aulbert
Hi all, Usually it's not possible to use name-based virtual hosts for SSL connections since the well known chicken-egg problem (at least if I understood the FAQ correctly). My question would be if there is some way of "emulating" this if one has a server which uses virtualization to run different