Re: [us...@httpd] apache cannot display images

2009-05-11 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 09.05.09 09:35, Igor Cicimov wrote: > The folder where you put the image and the image itself should be world > readable. No. It just has to be accessible by apache process, on un*x it means that only 'execute' bit is required for either user or group apache is running at. e.g. User httpd Gr

Re: [us...@httpd] apache cannot display images

2009-05-09 Thread André Warnier
Igor Cicimov wrote: The folder where you put the image and the image itself should be world readable. If that was the issue, then the OP would get a "forbidden" response, not a "non-available". On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:51 AM, André Warnier wrote: jeremy co wrote: Hi, I'm pretty new t

Re: [us...@httpd] apache cannot display images

2009-05-08 Thread Igor Cicimov
The folder where you put the image and the image itself should be world readable. On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:51 AM, André Warnier wrote: > jeremy co wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm pretty new to apache , I haven't change httpd.conf much yet, just root >> directory changed. >> >> >> what happen is I put

Re: [us...@httpd] apache cannot display images

2009-05-08 Thread André Warnier
jeremy co wrote: Hi, I'm pretty new to apache , I haven't change httpd.conf much yet, just root directory changed. what happen is I put jpg file in root directory and try to c=access it via , www.somedomain.com/pic.jpg and I get url of file instead in firefox and in IE I get image not displa

[us...@httpd] apache cannot display images

2009-05-08 Thread jeremy co
Hi, I'm pretty new to apache , I haven't change httpd.conf much yet, just root directory changed. what happen is I put jpg file in root directory and try to c=access it via , www.somedomain.com/pic.jpg and I get url of file instead in firefox and in IE I get image not displayed thumbnail with