[us...@httpd] content handler question

2009-01-23 Thread anson ho
If I have different content handlers set in server context and location context. Will both handler get processed? If so, what is the process sequence? Thanks - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Pro

Re: [us...@httpd] content handler question

2009-01-23 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:57 AM, anson ho wrote: > If I have different content handlers set in server context and > location context. Will both handler get processed? If so, what is the > process sequence? If it's via SetHandler, the one specified in the Location will be the "effective" value. T

Re: [us...@httpd] content handler question

2009-01-23 Thread anson ho
So, is there a way to chain the content handler, so that different content handlers can be processed one by one. Thanks again On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:57 AM, anson ho wrote: >> If I have different content handlers set in server context and

Re: [us...@httpd] content handler question

2009-01-23 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:15 AM, anson ho wrote: > So, is there a way to chain the content handler, so that different > content handlers can be processed one by one. No. Use a filter if you can. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com -

Re: [us...@httpd] content handler question

2009-01-23 Thread anson ho
Can you give me more hint as I am pretty new to apache Thanks On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:15 AM, anson ho wrote: >> So, is there a way to chain the content handler, so that different >> content handlers can be processed one by one. > > No. Us

Re: [us...@httpd] content handler question

2009-01-23 Thread anson ho
One more to mention is, I am using apache 1.3. Thanks On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:27 PM, anson ho wrote: > Can you give me more hint as I am pretty new to apache > > Thanks > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:15 AM, anson ho wrote: >>> So, is the

Re: [us...@httpd] content handler question

2009-01-23 Thread Brian Mearns
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 8:47 AM, anson ho wrote: > One more to mention is, I am using apache 1.3. > > Thanks > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:27 PM, anson ho wrote: >> Can you give me more hint as I am pretty new to apache >> >> Thanks >> >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >>>

Re: [us...@httpd] content handler question

2009-01-23 Thread anson ho
I have no way to upgrade apache as the content handler (a third party one) only support apache 1.3. So, is there any other ways that I can modify the response headers that were returned from the content handler. I've read mod_headers but it can only do simple operation. What I need to do is that ne

Re: [us...@httpd] content handler question

2009-01-23 Thread Brian Mearns
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:09 AM, anson ho wrote: > I have no way to upgrade apache as the content handler (a third party > one) only support apache 1.3. So, is there any other ways that I can > modify the response headers that were returned from the content > handler. I've read mod_headers but it

Re: [us...@httpd] content handler question

2009-01-23 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 00:09 +0800, anson ho wrote: > I have no way to upgrade apache as the content handler (a third party > one) only support apache 1.3. So, is there any other ways that I can > modify the response headers that were returned from the content > handler. I've read mod_headers but it

Re: [us...@httpd] content handler question

2009-01-23 Thread anson ho
This is one of the possible solutions that I was thinking. But it seems it will make the envirnoment more complex and even worse in a cluster environment. I am thinking if it is possible to do something like mod_headers. But first I need to ensure that I can read the existing headers in my own modu

Re: [us...@httpd] content handler question

2009-01-24 Thread André Warnier
anson ho wrote: This is one of the possible solutions that I was thinking. But it seems it will make the envirnoment more complex and even worse in a cluster environment. I am thinking if it is possible to do something like mod_headers. But first I need to ensure that I can read the existing head