Re: [us...@httpd] tomcat without apache in front

2009-05-21 Thread Tom Evans
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 19:28 -0600, si...@allumezinfotech.com wrote: > This is pretty cool explanation .. thanks so much and absolutely my bad > this particular thing of port 80 should be asked in tomcat user group ;) > > But any thoughts on handling of load for tommcat and apache in this case : >

Re: [us...@httpd] tomcat without apache in front

2009-05-20 Thread Joseph Morgan
I think you've answered your question. Take out Apache. Leave Tomcat where it is, and just hit Tomcat directly. Nothing wrong with opening port anything on app servers, just not the norm. However, an internal app on an internal machine, you should be fine. si...@allumezinfotech.com wrote: >> W

Re: [us...@httpd] tomcat without apache in front

2009-05-20 Thread singh
This is pretty cool explanation .. thanks so much and absolutely my bad this particular thing of port 80 should be asked in tomcat user group ;) But any thoughts on handling of load for tommcat and apache in this case : 2500 hits / min. > si...@allumezinfotech.com wrote: >> >> This is one thing i

Re: [us...@httpd] tomcat without apache in front

2009-05-20 Thread André Warnier
si...@allumezinfotech.com wrote: This is one thing i have heard from many what's the big deal in opening port 80 of app servers? any pointers There is no big deal having Tomcat answer directly on port 80. This topic then would be better posted on the Tomcat users mailing list, but in a nutshe

Re: [us...@httpd] tomcat without apache in front

2009-05-20 Thread singh
> > Well, of course, directly to tomcat. Every link in the chain makes the > chain longer and heavier, but you generally cannot lock the gate with a > one-link chain. Apache and Tomcat will do some caching, so it may not > matter. > > Is Tomcat and Apache on the same physical machine? -- Yes Are

Re: [us...@httpd] tomcat without apache in front

2009-05-20 Thread Joseph Morgan
Well, of course, directly to tomcat. Every link in the chain makes the chain longer and heavier, but you generally cannot lock the gate with a one-link chain. Apache and Tomcat will do some caching, so it may not matter. Is Tomcat and Apache on the same physical machine? Are there other t

Re: [us...@httpd] tomcat without apache in front

2009-05-20 Thread singh
Thanks for reply guys but i think i didnt put my question right ;( let me rephrase it : What is better in terms of response and resource utilisation when we have 2500 hits / min : 1. Directly on tomcat 2. Apache > AJP > tomcat Provided : Not static content to be served. > > You can make the r

Re: [us...@httpd] tomcat without apache in front

2009-05-20 Thread Joseph Morgan
You can make the request directly to Tomcat. What port is Tomcat listening on? Are you willing to open that port directly? Think about who/what is accessing that servlet. They will need to know that port. Is that OK? si...@allumezinfotech.com wrote: > Any Suggestions please? > > >> We

Re: [us...@httpd] tomcat without apache in front

2009-05-20 Thread Tom Evans
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 07:55 -0600, si...@allumezinfotech.com wrote: > Any Suggestions please? > > > We have a single servlet application very light weight. > > > > It is just like that servlet is called with some parameter and it returns > > some file from "n" number of files on local file system.

Re: [us...@httpd] tomcat without apache in front

2009-05-20 Thread singh
Any Suggestions please? > We have a single servlet application very light weight. > > It is just like that servlet is called with some parameter and it returns > some file from "n" number of files on local file system. > > It is an old application and some how it is having apache in front of > tom

[us...@httpd] tomcat without apache in front

2009-05-19 Thread singh
We have a single servlet application very light weight. It is just like that servlet is called with some parameter and it returns some file from "n" number of files on local file system. It is an old application and some how it is having apache in front of tomcat. What i am thinking is what is m