> Lots of things could be better. To me it is clear that the overall
> system expects an AuthType to be set if you will be doing authn and
> authz.
Thx for clarification - this was at least not clear to me.
>
> The error message is one indication of that
But it appears only if the
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Torsten Krah wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 15.03.2018, 10:44 -0400 schrieb Eric Covener:
>> I think you should be setting it to a customized string or an existing
>> one if you want a fallthrough behavior. Anything else seems
>>
Am Donnerstag, den 15.03.2018, 10:44 -0400 schrieb Eric Covener:
> I think you should be setting it to a customized string or an existing
> one if you want a fallthrough behavior. Anything else seems
> undefined/dangerous.
lua docs does not tell that i should set AuthType anywhere searching for
> I've implemented neither None, Basic, Digest or Form - so i did not set that
> on purpose, i just used the LuaHookCheckUserID directive to implement my
> arbitrary authentication hook - so its more something like AuthType == CUSTOM.
I think you should be setting it to a customized string or
I am using an arbitrary authentication with mod_lua which works so far.
Authentication is done via mod_lua:
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/de/mod/mod_lua.html#luahookcheckuserid
Authorization is done via mod_authz_svn.
I did that and set r.user = 'foo' to the request - just always the same