Re: [users@httpd] matches when ServerName directive is omitted

2018-06-23 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 06/23/2018 10:34 AM, billy noah wrote: Thanks Eric, the rdns almost certainly /did /change so that could be the culprit.  Do you have a definitive answer or a way to determine how apache decides what "ServerName" should be when the directive is absent? From the documentation: If no

Re: [users@httpd] matches when ServerName directive is omitted

2018-06-23 Thread billy noah
Thanks Eric, the rdns almost certainly *did *change so that could be the culprit. Do you have a definitive answer or a way to determine how apache decides what "ServerName" should be when the directive is absent? I'll stick with the policy of using something (even nonsense as you suggested) in th

Re: [users@httpd] matches when ServerName directive is omitted

2018-06-23 Thread Eric Covener
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 11:22 AM billy noah wrote: > > I am in the process of migrating some sites from a server running Apache > 2.4.7 to a new installation (Ubuntu 18) running Apache 2.4.29 and running > into some issues with VirtualHost matching. > > On my old server I have a config like this

[users@httpd] matches when ServerName directive is omitted

2018-06-23 Thread billy noah
I am in the process of migrating some sites from a server running Apache 2.4.7 to a new installation (Ubuntu 18) running Apache 2.4.29 and running into some issues with VirtualHost matching. On my old server I have a config like this: ServerAlias *.dev.example.com VirtualDocumentRoot /va