Re: [users@httpd] About ServerLimit

2020-07-08 Thread Mahmood Naderan
One more thing. With this output WKWWKWRKKRKWWKWWRWWRRKWWKRWKKR.RWR._W_R.RKRKK.RCWWKW_R.W..KKWWK. WCWKKK_KWWWRR.R..WWKWWRK.WWWRRW.WWW.WRK_WR.R..KWWKKRW.KCWK.W ..R_..WW

Re: [users@httpd] About ServerLimit

2020-07-08 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 7:49 AM Mahmood Naderan wrote: > > > >But it's more straightforward to use /server-status if you care about > >things like ServerLimit then trying to reverse engineer from netstat. > > > > OK I can see that report. > > It is saying that 109 requests currently being

Re: [users@httpd] About ServerLimit

2020-07-08 Thread Mahmood Naderan
>But it's more straightforward to use /server-status if you care about >things like ServerLimit then trying to reverse engineer from netstat. OK I can see that report. It is saying that 109 requests currently being processed., 18 idle workers. Is that 109 the same as the number of apache2

Re: [users@httpd] About ServerLimit

2020-07-08 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 5:44 AM Mahmood Naderan wrote: > > Hello > > When I set ServerLimit to 500, does that include all TCP connection states? I > mean > are all these counted by ServerLimit? Or just ESTABLISHED is counted? > > > tcp6 0 0 192.168.168.91:443 X:18212 FIN_WAIT2

[users@httpd] About ServerLimit

2020-07-08 Thread Mahmood Naderan
Hello When I set ServerLimit to 500, does that include all TCP connection states? I mean are all these counted by ServerLimit? Or just ESTABLISHED is counted? tcp6   0  0 192.168.168.91:443  X:18212 FIN_WAIT2   - tcp6   0  0 192.168.168.91:443  X:14756 TIME_WAIT