Many thanks it work's :-)))
Le 19/08/2014 20:17, Eric Covener a écrit :
I think you're missing the AuthnProviderAlias fix and it just happens
to fail a different way (no Bug? message). I recall this failure being
very silent.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/aaa
I think you're missing the AuthnProviderAlias fix and it just happens
to fail a different way (no Bug? message). I recall this failure being
very silent.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/modules/aaa/mod_authn_core.c?r1=1556817&r2=1556818&pathrev=1556818&view=patch
On Tue,
Could you just tell me how to do that ?
LogLevel authz_core:trace8 authn_core:trace8
Is correct ? Because i have nothing more ...
A full "debug" log :
[Tue Aug 19 20:02:26.407058 2014] [authz_core:debug] [pid 5489]
mod_authz_core.c(809): [client 109.133.130.18:59769] AH01626:
authorization
Can you enable trace8 logging and post a full error log? There is a
confusing step where authorization stuff runs twice (before/after user
authenticated).
Hopefully you started with 2.4.8 or later, since AuthnProviderAlias
also had this same bug.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Andreatta Sébasti
Thanks for your reactivity ;o)
Unfortunately, the patch is not working.
mod_authz_core.c is well patched
After recompiling the rpm and update it i still can't log me with a ldap
account :
[Tue Aug 19 19:04:54.929367 2014] [authz_core:debug] [pid 18568]
mod_authz_core.c(809): [client 109.133.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Andreatta Sébastien
wrote:
> I can try to rebuild apache yes, but i need to deploy a new VM
I think your issue is fixed in the path in the last comment here:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56870
I can try to rebuild apache yes, but i need to deploy a new VM
Le 19/08/2014 14:09, Eric Covener a écrit :
It looks like a bug, are you able to rebuild with a patch?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.o
It looks like a bug, are you able to rebuild with a patch?
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Andreatta Sébastien
wrote:
> Yes you're right... just a bad copy/past..
>
> Here the correct configuration file :
>
>
> AuthLDAPBindDN cn=Manager,dc=soez,dc=be
> AuthLDAPBindPassword bmqD9:q9pmCx
Yes you're right... just a bad copy/past..
Here the correct configuration file :
AuthLDAPBindDN cn=Manager,dc=soez,dc=be
AuthLDAPBindPassword bmqD9:q9pmCx
AuthLDAPURL ldap://localhost/ou=Users,o=soez,dc=soez,dc=be?uid??
cn=Warez,ou=Groups,o=soez,dc=soez,dc=be>
AuthLDAPBindDN
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Andreatta Sébastien
wrote:
> [Tue Aug 19 12:44:20.230719 2014] [authz_core:error] [pid 21409] [client
> 109.133.130.18:50217] AH02305: no alias provider found for
> 'ldap-group-warez' (BUG?)
There is no such thing as an authorization alias. Where do you think
"ld
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> There is no such thing as an authorization alias. Where do you think
Duh, of course there is. Sorry. But you don't have one by that particular name.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
---
Hi,
I write you today because i'm just upgrade from Centos 6.5 ( httpd 2.2 )
to Centos 7 ( httpd 2.4.6 ) .
Now, I try to use AuthzProviderAlias and I finally successfully make it
work with http.
Here's my config ( /etc/httpd/conf.d/ldap.conf )
AuthLDAPBindDN cn=Manager,dc=Domain,dc=be
12 matches
Mail list logo
