On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 5:13 PM sebb wrote:
>
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2022 at 20:39, Eric Covener wrote:
>
> Thanks for the speedy reply.
>
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 3:21 PM sebb wrote:
> > >
> > > The documentation for AuthzProviderAlias [1] looks wrong.
> > >
> > > AFAICT including 'Require all gr
On Sat, 3 Dec 2022 at 20:39, Eric Covener wrote:
Thanks for the speedy reply.
>
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 3:21 PM sebb wrote:
> >
> > The documentation for AuthzProviderAlias [1] looks wrong.
> >
> > AFAICT including 'Require all granted' means that anyone can access
> > the directory.
> > This
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 3:21 PM sebb wrote:
>
> The documentation for AuthzProviderAlias [1] looks wrong.
>
> AFAICT including 'Require all granted' means that anyone can access
> the directory.
> This is borne out by my local testing.
That is odd and should not be in the example, even in such a c
The documentation for AuthzProviderAlias [1] looks wrong.
AFAICT including 'Require all granted' means that anyone can access
the directory.
This is borne out by my local testing.
If I remove the Require line, then httpd complains "AuthUserFile not
specified in the configuration". Presumably this
