Re: [users@httpd] Is this a hacking attempt ?

2005-06-08 Thread Maxim Vexler
On 6/7/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could be a spider. It's not a spider, I did a reverse lookup on the IP, it resolves to a Israeli ISP. Thank you. Google, or Akmai or something... Did the directory/files exist at one point? Their indexer checks to see if the page exists

Re: [users@httpd] Is this a hacking attempt ?

2005-06-08 Thread Maxim Vexler
On 6/7/05, Patrick Donker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you do an ip lookup for the source ip? If it belongs to one of the searchengine clubs, then it is unlikely. I did a reverse DNS lookup. Is this what you meant by ip lookup ? Any tips on this would be most welcome. And if it is an attempt,

Re: [users@httpd] Is this a hacking attempt ?

2005-06-08 Thread Florin Gherendi
If you want to find the owner of a certain IP range, you can use the whois command line application (in unix/linux) or as well the following web address: http://www.radb.net. Do not use them abusively! Florin On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 11:17, Maxim Vexler wrote: A b.t.w question, if I may : Someone

[users@httpd] Is this a hacking attempt ?

2005-06-07 Thread Maxim Vexler
Is this an hacking attempt ? Could someone please suggest a way to decrypted the \xd7\x92\xd7\x99\ things. ## Apache Error log : Start ## IP domain were blurred for privacy reasons. [Tue Jun 07 17:49:23 2005] [error] [client 62.0.x.x] File

RE: [users@httpd] Is this a hacking attempt ?

2005-06-07 Thread PMilanese
Could be a spider. Google, or Akmai or something... Did the directory/files exist at one point? Their indexer checks to see if the page exists and corrects itself. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 12:08 PM To:

Re: [users@httpd] Is this a hacking attempt ?

2005-06-07 Thread Patrick Donker
Maxim Vexler wrote: Is this an hacking attempt ? Could someone please suggest a way to decrypted the \xd7\x92\xd7\x99\ things. ## Apache Error log : Start ## IP domain were blurred for privacy reasons. [Tue Jun 07 17:49:23 2005] [error]