Re: [users@httpd] Load Balancer with HTTPS

2011-03-08 Thread Martin Barry
$quoted_author = "Christian Pascher" ; > > If I would activate > RequestHeader set Front-End-Https "On" > I need all the SSL config stuff also at the back end servers? No. That setting just let's Apache know that, even though it is seeing http connections, the client is seeing https with the SSL

Re: [users@httpd] Load Balancer with HTTPS

2011-03-08 Thread Christian Pascher
So if I only want that people can access http://example.com and https://example.com and all the subpages I don't need it? (I don't have any redirect statement in my configs) If I would activate RequestHeader set Front-End-Https "On" I need all the SSL config stuff also at the back end servers?

Re: [users@httpd] Load Balancer with HTTPS

2011-03-08 Thread Daniel Holth
The back end is only speaking http, but if it were to generate e.g. a redirect it would need to redirect to https://something instead of http://something . The 'https?' header preserves that information.

Re: [users@httpd] Load Balancer with HTTPS

2011-03-08 Thread Christian Pascher
Is this necessary? I would also have to configure HTTPS also on the back end servers, if I use this? I thought, the web browser already uses a secure connection to the load balancer, so i don't need HTTPS at the back end. Am 2011-03-08 22:50, schrieb Daniel Holth: The header allows a properly c

Re: [users@httpd] Load Balancer with HTTPS

2011-03-08 Thread Daniel Holth
The header allows a properly configured back end to generate https:// URLs instead of http:// URLs when it is being accessed securely.

[users@httpd] Load Balancer with HTTPS

2011-03-08 Thread Christian Pascher
Hi, I have a Apache Webserver with 2 Apache Backend-Servers. It is possible to access webpages over HTTPS (configured on the loadbalancer). It all works very well but yesterday I read something about changing the HTTP-Header: RequestHeader set Front-End-Https "On" Do I need this? Regards,