Re: [users@httpd] Named virtual host dot local [.local] tld

2011-02-22 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 12.02.11 16:29, Richard Sergeant wrote: > Deployment of the testbed.local fails. Apache is seeing the host header > 'testbed.local', but it refuses to serve up that virtual host, instead > giving the default site. How and where is the "default site" configured? > And this is the NVH declarati

Re: [users@httpd] Named virtual host dot local [.local] tld

2011-02-12 Thread Richard Sergeant
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 11:53 -0500, Eric Covener wrote: > > without mention of what it considers to be valid TLD's, so any > > pointers on this would be helpful. > > It doesn't care, it's just a string comparison. Adding whatever you > want to your hosts file or local DNS "just works". That's

Re: [users@httpd] Named virtual host dot local [.local] tld

2011-02-12 Thread Eric Covener
> without mention of what it considers to be valid TLD's, so any > pointers on this would be helpful. It doesn't care, it's just a string comparison. Adding whatever you want to your hosts file or local DNS "just works". Maybe you have a non-wildcard VirtualHost that matches instead of the s

[users@httpd] Named virtual host dot local [.local] tld

2011-02-12 Thread Richard Sergeant
I have a test deployment: Server version: Apache/2.2.12 with a number of virtual hosts. All work fine without any issues, and have done so for quite some time. Today I wanted to add a named virtual host called 'testbed.local'. This is resolvable in the local lan using a local name server (rather t