Re: [users@httpd] ProxyPass ! directive

2017-03-13 Thread Matthew Broadhead
thanks for your help. i don't think the problem is the syntax of the configuration. i have submitted a bug on bz.apache.org and have already been in communication with a developer there who has helped me figure it out. in case it helps someone else it looks like it might be a clash with

Re: [users@httpd] ProxyPass ! directive

2017-03-13 Thread Filipe Cifali
The docs say you should use ProxyPass "!" Or ProxyPass "/.well-known/" "!" I do think the second one is more clear, but they both use double quotes on the ! marker, have you tried to put the double quotes? BUT reading a bit more I found this: For the same reasons, exclusions must come

Re: [users@httpd] ProxyPass ! directive

2017-03-13 Thread Matthew Broadhead
hi, i know this is a community list but i have had this problem for a long time and it seems really fundamental. is there any way i can get some help on this? shall i file a bug report at JIRA or something? On 10/03/2017 17:43, Matthew Broadhead wrote: i moved the LogLevel directive to

Re: [users@httpd] ProxyPass ! directive

2017-03-10 Thread Matthew Broadhead
i moved the LogLevel directive to httpd.conf and now i get this [Fri Mar 10 16:41:21.491354 2017] [proxy:debug] [pid 18744] proxy_util.c(1936): AH00931: initialized single connection worker in child 18744 for (*) [Fri Mar 10 16:41:21.496525 2017] [proxy:debug] [pid 18745] proxy_util.c(1885):

Re: [users@httpd] ProxyPass ! directive

2017-03-10 Thread Matthew Broadhead
i also added this in the virtual host LogLevel info proxy:debug but it makes no difference to the output in error_log On 10/03/2017 16:48, Eric Covener wrote: On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Matthew Broadhead wrote: yes it is definitely because of that line.

Re: [users@httpd] ProxyPass ! directive

2017-03-10 Thread Matthew Broadhead
i was looking at this message http://markmail.org/message/ne2rdzm5westbcvb well it doesn't work either way in my case. is there any way to test mod_proxy to find out why it isn't working? when i first moved to CentOS 7 i used an old configuration which worked perfectly on CentOS 6 but i

Re: [users@httpd] ProxyPass ! directive

2017-03-10 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Matthew Broadhead wrote: > yes it is definitely because of that line. i also just tried > > ProxyPass ajp://www.nbmlaw.co.uk:8010/ > > > ProxyPass ! > > and that has exactly the same effect That syntax is known to not work.

Re: [users@httpd] ProxyPass ! directive

2017-03-10 Thread Matthew Broadhead
yes it is definitely because of that line. i also just tried ProxyPass ajp://www.nbmlaw.co.uk:8010/ ProxyPass ! and that has exactly the same effect On 10/03/2017 16:30, Eric Covener wrote: On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Matthew Broadhead wrote:

Re: [users@httpd] ProxyPass ! directive

2017-03-10 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Matthew Broadhead wrote: > Declaring the following directives in a virtual host > ProxyPass "/.well-known/" ! # don't pass lets encrypt folder > ProxyPass "/" ajp://localhost:8010/ # pass root to tomcat server >

[users@httpd] ProxyPass ! directive

2017-03-10 Thread Matthew Broadhead
Operating System: CentOS7 Operating System Version number: centos-release-7-3.1611.el7.centos.x86_64 Httpd Version: httpd-2.4.6-45.el7.centos.x86_64 Issue: Declaring the following directives in a virtual host ProxyPass "/.well-known/" ! # don't pass lets encrypt folder ProxyPass "/"

Re: [users@httpd] ProxyPass ! directive seems to have no effect

2016-03-21 Thread Luca Toscano
Hi Matthew, are you upgrading from 2.2 to 2.4? Moreover, I'd use https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/core.html#loglevel for mod_proxy to get more data about what's happening. The httpd version is also a bit old (upstream is 2.4.18 now and Debian for example has 2.4.10 in stable). Luca

Re: [users@httpd] ProxyPass ! directive seems to have no effect

2016-03-21 Thread Matthew Broadhead
hi, i am still experiencing this problem. does anyone know what might possibly cause this? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] ProxyPass ! directive seems to have no effect

2016-03-20 Thread Matthew Broadhead
FYI server: centos-release-7-2.1511.el7.centos.2.10.x86_64 httpd: httpd-2.4.6-40.el7.centos.x86_64 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

[users@httpd] ProxyPass ! directive seems to have no effect

2016-03-19 Thread Matthew Broadhead
I am in the middle of migrating a server and my old virtual host config which worked fine was like this |ProxyPass /images ! ProxyPass / ajp://domain.tld:8010/ nocanon | It passes ok to Tomcat but the ! directive is being ignored. There are no errors thrown. What might be causing this?

[users@httpd] ProxyPass directive fails on IPv6 address:

2014-06-29 Thread Nader Zeid
I'm using Apache to front-end some servers listening on loopback but the ProxyPass directive doesn't like IPv6 addresses. I spin up a server on IPv6 address [::1]:8001, confirmed working using cURL and shown here on nestat: tcp0 0 ::1:8001:::* LISTEN

[users@httpd] ProxyPass directive with max parameter

2013-01-31 Thread Lopez Jarillo, Cesar
Hello all I'mt trying to use the max option configuring a ProxyPass directive, but it seems that it has no effect. I'm testing with a new installation, so you will find that I am using a reduced size for threads, childs, etc I am using HTTP 2.2.23 with mpm worker. The most important