On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Idea: we should consider keeping that prg open as a forked child, ala fcgi.
> Seems like a reasonable improvement :)
It does that part already, but httpd uses a global lock to send
requests to stdin and read responses on stdout.
---
On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:37 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> Using prg on a high-volume site is discouraged, as all requests will be fed
> through a single instance of the prg, creating a significant bottleneck. The
> dash2under.pl example is just that - an example - and there are better ways
> to accom
On 08/19/2014 10:39 AM, Rose, John B wrote:
Any experienced users of the external program "prg" mechanism of
Rewritemap who use a compiled binary file as opposed to interpreted
language?
Is there an appreciable performance difference on a high volume site,
even when the program is simple? S
Any experienced users of the external program "prg" mechanism of Rewritemap
who use a compiled binary file as opposed to interpreted language?
Is there an appreciable performance difference on a high volume site, even when
the program is simple? Such as the dash2under.pl example on the Apache
