Re: [users@httpd] Upgrading to httpd 2.4 and documentation - Any missing info?

2016-03-15 Thread Michael A. Peters
You're probably right. What scared them into disabling all the unsafe ciphers was an ssllabs report showing a grade of F in combination with am arstechnica article on how cheap it is to use an Amazon cloud account to crack export cipher suites. They respect me, I found holes in several

Re: [users@httpd] Upgrading to httpd 2.4 and documentation - Any missing info?

2016-03-15 Thread Michael A. Peters
On 03/15/2016 12:23 AM, Luca Toscano wrote: Hi Apache users! A while ago there was an interesting discussion on the dev@ mailing list about the adoption percentage of httpd 2.2 vs 2.4, and I was wondering if the people that have not upgraded yet have suggestion about whether or not the

[users@httpd] Upgrading to httpd 2.4 and documentation - Any missing info?

2016-03-15 Thread Luca Toscano
Hi Apache users! A while ago there was an interesting discussion on the dev@ mailing list about the adoption percentage of httpd 2.2 vs 2.4, and I was wondering if the people that have not upgraded yet have suggestion about whether or not the documentation needs any improvement to facilitate the