Ah OK. Well, even without the Force of Jedi, I can already foresee a
difficult path before me if I'm to compile my own binary for Windows ...
Most of all, by the absence of confirmation, I think it's just not possible
to compile with Visual Studio *Express*. Too bad...
So, is the support for
Binaries for windows can be gotten from the aforementioned Apache
Lounge, www.apachelounge.com
On 14 November 2013 14:03, STF laps...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah OK. Well, even without the Force of Jedi, I can already foresee a
difficult path before me if I'm to compile my own binary for Windows ...
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:03 AM, STF laps...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah OK. Well, even without the Force of Jedi, I can already foresee a
difficult path before me if I'm to compile my own binary for Windows ...
Most of all, by the absence of confirmation, I think it's just not
possible to compile
OK, thank you, even though I'm not sure where Apache lounge was
*aforementionned* in this thread. But from the about of its web site,
it's stated that ApacheLounge.com is not affiliated with, or endorsed by,
the Apache Software Foundation. Hope someone has audited its compiled
binaries to make
Eric mentioned it in passing, There are some decent scripts to drive
the build end-to-end with the
dependencies, some have occasionally been posted on Apache Lounge.
And: binaries from *all* sources could be considered suspicious...
On 14 November 2013 14:48, STF laps...@gmail.com wrote:
OK,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:48 AM, STF laps...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, thank you, even though I'm not sure where Apache lounge was
*aforementionned* in this thread.
mentioned before my post, though not before yours ;)
But from the about of its web site, it's stated that ApacheLounge.com
is
On 14 November 2013 14:42, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:03 AM, STF laps...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah OK. Well, even without the Force of Jedi, I can already foresee a
difficult path before me if I'm to compile my own binary for Windows ...
Most of all, by the
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:06 PM, STF laps...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not looking for some IT adventure if that's what you mean. I have a
job and I don't have spare time to explore unknown territories lol I
really want to use Apache httpd in windows at the latest version if
possible.
So use
Nobody has posted httpd binaries for Windows to httpd.apache.org in quite
a while, and they were never official anyway, whatever that means.
Not true. Cf:
http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/FAQ#Why_isn.27t_there_a_binary_for_my_platform.3F
Binaries for Windows are official stuffs. Or if you
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:06 AM, STF laps...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 November 2013 14:42, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 8:03 AM, STF laps...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah OK. Well, even without the Force of Jedi, I can already foresee a
difficult path before me if
Eric,
Why not remove the win32 binaries altogether and just mention that
win32 binaries are available at Apache Lounge? This would mirror eg
the Linux kernel which is only supplied as a binary in a distribution.
Cheers,
Colin
On 14 November 2013 15:21, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Colin 't Hart co...@sharpheart.org wrote:
Eric,
Why not remove the win32 binaries altogether and just mention that
win32 binaries are available at Apache Lounge? This would mirror eg
the Linux kernel which is only supplied as a binary in a distribution.
It's
Hi,
I've found back this old thread about binary for Windows. But I don't
still quite understand the official position for Windows, if there's
any... I suppose official Windows binary for 2.4 will not be provided.
OK, no problem. That means we have to compile our own binary. But I can't
find
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:41 AM, STF laps...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've found back this old thread about binary for Windows. But I don't still
quite understand the official position for Windows, if there's any... I
suppose official Windows binary for 2.4 will not be provided. OK, no
14 matches
Mail list logo
