On 3/14/19 2:43 AM, Gajanan Kulkarni wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Thanks for taking look in to this mail. appreciate it.
>
> This is what I get
>
> httpd -V
>
>
> Server built: Feb 15 2019 10:25:19
Very recent .. good.
> Server's Module Magic Number: 20120211:76
> Server loaded: APR 1.6.3, APR-UTIL
Hi
Thanks for taking look in to this mail. appreciate it.
This is what I get
httpd -V
Server built: Feb 15 2019 10:25:19
Server's Module Magic Number: 20120211:76
Server loaded: APR 1.6.3, APR-UTIL 1.6.1
Compiled using: APR 1.6.3, APR-UTIL 1.6.1
Architecture: 64-bit
Server MPM:
Server
On 3/12/19 6:59 AM, Gajanan Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi
>
> We are seeing memory growth in Apache 2.4.33 on Solaris.
>
> Is there any known issue or fix for this.
>
A little data would help.
What does httpd -V report ?
--
Dennis Clarke
RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC
UNIX and Linux spoken
GreyBeard
Hi
We are seeing memory growth in Apache 2.4.33 on Solaris.
Is there any known issue or fix for this.
Thanks
Gajanan.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 2:10 PM Chuck Stein wrote:
>
> I am finally upgrading an Apache 2.2 server to 2.4 and caching has
> changed. The Apache server is used in a confined area and is not on the
> web. I was previously using mod_mem_cache to cache in memory responses
> from my custom back-end
I am finally upgrading an Apache 2.2 server to 2.4 and caching has
changed. The Apache server is used in a confined area and is not on the
web. I was previously using mod_mem_cache to cache in memory responses
from my custom back-end tile server module which serves up tiles of data
from a
Apache HTTP Server security may be impacted by missing bounds checks in the
SDBM implementation from APR prior to version 1.6.3 (released October 22, 2017)
[1]. SDBM can be used in various parts of Apache HTTP Server including most
notably for authentication and object caching. While it is
Also, check if you are using worker instead of prefork.
2017-07-03 14:12 GMT-03:00 Rose, John B :
> We found we did not need several modules that were loaded by default. So we
> removed those.
>
> Using php-fpm instead of mod_php
>
> If your folks are using a cms, are they using
We found we did not need several modules that were loaded by default. So we
removed those.
Using php-fpm instead of mod_php
If your folks are using a cms, are they using unnecessary plugins?
Sent from my iPad
> On Jul 3, 2017, at 1:01 PM, Doug Maurer wrote:
>
> Is there
Is there a way to limit the amount of RAM being used without reducing
the number of servers/processes? Or is apache designed to just take as
must memory as it can and hold on to it?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
. The Earth sucks.
Von: Rose, John B [jbr...@utk.edu]
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. September 2015 22:28
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: **SPAM?** [users@httpd] Memory mapping in Apache question [wd-vc]
Apache 2.2
Prefork
Red Hat 6
We did a small test with a single
Apache 2.2
Prefork
Red Hat 6
We did a small test with a single image to compare results of it as memory
mapped content and not memory mapped. I expected the memory mapped image to be
quicker to load. But in our testing that did not seem to be the case. Should
accessing a memory mapped image be
Red Hat 7 Apache 2.4.6
Filesystem is local
How does updating the cache in RAM of frequently viewed pages with MMapFile
work if you change sections of
the page frequently, but say 75% of page stays the same? Like calendar
Items on the page. Or news releases. Since that is common nowadays.
Do we
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Rose, John B jbr...@utk.edu wrote:
Do we have to restart Apache to update the cache?
The manual says When the files have changed on the filesystem at
least a HUP or USR1 signal should be send to the server to re-mmap()
them.
Hi All,
I can see this exception in my logs and users were not able to complete the
transaction.
I am not sure in which scenarios this error will come.
Please let me know why and when this error will be seen and how can i
resolve the issue. Are there any parameter changes that are required to
...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Oktober 2014 09:41
An: users
Betreff: [users@httpd] Memory allocation request exceeded 65,000 bytes [wd-vc]
Hi All,
I can see this exception in my logs and users were not able to complete the
transaction.
I am not sure in which scenarios this error will come.
Please
Something's not right here...
The original message stated that my windows RAM has been increased.
Yet the response says that prefork workers are used.
The Windows platform only supports one MPM -- one specifically for Windows.
On 3/21/2014 12:47 AM, Voshka Niknam wrote:
Hello,
make it use
Recently my windows RAM has been increased. Wanted to increase/allocate
memory to apache process too.. is there a way ?
thanks.
Hello,
what is your apache handler and the MPM used?
Thanks
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Shanmugavel MANI
ershanmuga...@gmail.comwrote:
Recently my windows RAM has been increased. Wanted to increase/allocate
memory to apache process too.. is there a way ?
thanks.
--
Woshka
Hillo Voshka,
Thanks for your reply. fastcgi and prefork,workers.
thanks in advance.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Voshka Niknam vosh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
what is your apache handler and the MPM used?
Thanks
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Shanmugavel MANI
Hello,
make it use MPM_Worker or the newest one MPM_EVENT
prefork is none threaded and slow one and in high requests it consumes more
memory
also fastcgi cache requests in an ammount of time and you should see the
documentation to change the duration to make it free up the cached requests
php5_module (shared)
third strike -- look into fastcgi.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org
Hello list,
i have a problem with my home server that runs Apache httpd 2.2.16
((Debian)).
I'm forced to restart Apache every 12h due to memory leak.
This is a pic of RAM usage:
http://s11.postimg.org/3vidk2hlf/rrd.png
If you see, at the end of Wed, ram usage incresed to 4GB+ and apache was
not
Well, two things jump out from your list of modules. Firstly, there's
this:
mpm_itk_module (static)
Does the problem occur if you use prefork instead?
Secondly, there's this:
cgi_module (shared)
cgid_module (shared)
Since I'm unfamiliar with mpm_itk, it may not be a problem there but
I am seeing memory usage, as reported by free creeping up with time, before
eventually plateauing. Free reported 2,495Gb used, and 1,337Gb free. The
summary in top seemed to concur with these values. However if I add up the
memory used by various process I cannot account for anywhere near that.
Hello,
I installed httpd 2.4.2 on CentOS6.2(64bit).
It seems like httpd leaks memory when mod_ssl is used.
When I start up httpd with mod_ssl, and when I issue apachectl graceful,
it seems like httpd leaks memory.
If I issue apachectl graceful 1000 times, ps command shows
the memory usage gets
Hi all,
We have just witnessed a memory leak in the case of Apache 2.2.16 with
WinOpenSSL running on Windows when downloading a file that is served from the
disk via the AliasMatch directive and does not reside in the cache but is
configured as cacheable.
In this case, we see that the child
27 matches
Mail list logo