Re: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance

2011-01-28 Thread Igor Galić
- john 3 newton john.3.new...@bt.com wrote: Solaris 10 Apache version: 2.2.11 2.2.17 (32 64 bit) We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform (T2000) to an x86/64 platform (x2270-m2) and we have noticed an erratic response time for downloads of files using SSL.

RE: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance

2011-01-28 Thread john.3.newton
SNIP random device can make a huge difference. What do you use for random data? /dev/random or /dev/urandom? If the rofmer, try the latter if it helps. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Matus - I have actually tried both, as well as builtin. I have also

RE: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance

2011-01-28 Thread john.3.newton
On Thursday, January 27, 2011 11:24 AM, Am 27.01.2011 16:34, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 22.01.11 00:53, john.3.new...@bt.com wrote: We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform (T2000) to an x86/64 platform (x2270-m2) and we have noticed an erratic response time

RE: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance

2011-01-28 Thread john.3.newton
- Igor Galić [mailto:i.ga...@brainsware.org] wrote: - john 3 newton john.3.new...@bt.com wrote: Solaris 10 Apache version: 2.2.11 2.2.17 (32 64 bit) We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform (T2000) to an x86/64 platform (x2270-m2) and we have noticed an

Re: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance

2011-01-27 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 22.01.11 00:53, john.3.new...@bt.com wrote: We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform (T2000) to an x86/64 platform (x2270-m2) and we have noticed an erratic response time for downloads of files using SSL. This seems to randomly occur with any files about 10k or

Re: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance

2011-01-27 Thread Edgar Frank
Am 27.01.2011 16:34, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas: On 22.01.11 00:53, john.3.new...@bt.com wrote: We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform (T2000) to an x86/64 platform (x2270-m2) and we have noticed an erratic response time for downloads of files using SSL. This

RE: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance

2011-01-24 Thread john.3.newton
: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance I found that turning KeepAlive On makes a huge difference to SSL performance (or performance in general). On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:53 AM, john.3.new...@bt.com wrote: Solaris 10 Apache version: 2.2.11 2.2.17 (32 64 bit) We recently moved our

Re: [users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance

2011-01-22 Thread Devraj Mukherjee
I found that turning KeepAlive On makes a huge difference to SSL performance (or performance in general). On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:53 AM, john.3.new...@bt.com wrote: Solaris 10 Apache version: 2.2.11 2.2.17 (32 64 bit) We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform

[users@httpd] mod_ssl, erratic performance

2011-01-21 Thread john.3.newton
Solaris 10 Apache version: 2.2.11 2.2.17 (32 64 bit) We recently moved our production webserver from a sparc platform (T2000) to an x86/64 platform (x2270-m2) and we have noticed an erratic response time for downloads of files using SSL. This seems to randomly occur with any files about 10k