Re: [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used)

2016-05-24 Thread james pruett
quick reply. I got taken off this task for now, but I plan on compiling 2.4. Thanks for the help guys! Jim On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 11:03 -0500, james pruett wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > My boss wants us to provide a redirect

Re: [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used)

2016-05-20 Thread Nick Kew
On Thu, 2016-05-19 at 11:03 -0500, james pruett wrote: > Hi, > > > My boss wants us to provide a redirect page for use during > site-maintanance. > > > I assume this means I need to add mod_rewrite. Nothing remotely so complex! Just put your maintenance page somewhere, and start the server

RE: [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used)

2016-05-20 Thread Scott Birl
figuration via: apachectl configtest And if the syntax checks out OK: apachectl graceful From: james pruett [mailto:gpscru...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 4:41 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used) so, what would you do?

Re: [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used)

2016-05-20 Thread Yehuda Katz
2 different Apaches you've mentioned (oh ... earlier you used >> 2.0, this top one is 1.3) >> >> >> mod_so needs to be compiled in (only Apache 1.3.37) to make use of >> dynamic modules. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >

Re: [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used)

2016-05-20 Thread james pruett
es. > > > > > > > > > > From: james pruett [mailto:gpscru...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 4:21 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used) > > It can't find it. I tried all of these one

RE: [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used)

2016-05-20 Thread Scott Birl
com] Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 4:21 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used) It can't find it. I tried all of these one at a time, and they all error as shown -httpd.conf--- # Example: # LoadModule foo_module libexec/mod_foo.so

Re: [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used)

2016-05-20 Thread Yehuda Katz
01 PM, Scott Birl <sb...@temple.edu> wrote: > >> It should be similar to the grep example you had earlier, so: >> LoadModule rewrite_module libexec/mod_rewrite.so >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: james pruett [mailto:gpscru...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday

Re: [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used)

2016-05-20 Thread james pruett
16 1:57 PM > Cc: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used) > > Thanks for continued help! > > Do I add this or this? > LoadModule rewrite_module modules/mod_rewrite.so > LoadModule rewrite_module libexec/mod_rewrite.so > &g

RE: [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used)

2016-05-20 Thread Scott Birl
It should be similar to the grep example you had earlier, so: LoadModule rewrite_module libexec/mod_rewrite.so From: james pruett [mailto:gpscru...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 1:57 PM Cc: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used

Re: [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used)

2016-05-20 Thread james pruett
ratch. > > > > > > > > *From:* james pruett [mailto:gpscru...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, May 19, 2016 12:03 PM > *To:* users@httpd.apache.org > *Subject:* [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used) > > > > Hi, > > > > My boss wants us

RE: [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used)

2016-05-20 Thread Scott Birl
lto:gpscru...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 12:03 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used) Hi, My boss wants us to provide a redirect page for use during site-maintanance. I assume this means I need to add mod_rewrite. Q:Can I add mod_rew

[users@httpd] old solaris box (but heavily used)

2016-05-19 Thread james pruett
Hi, My boss wants us to provide a redirect page for use during site-maintanance. I assume this means I need to add mod_rewrite. Q:Can I add mod_rewrite to my server without re-compiling? Thanks for any leads. I really appreciate it. I usually tip if that is an option. I insist! Jim Pruett