On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 12:18 -0500, Sean Conner wrote:
> It was thus said that the Great Tom Evans once stated:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Sean Conner wrote:
> > > And really, how often is Apache restarted? On a graceful restart, it can
> > > still serve requests.
> > >
> >
> > It's c
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Sean Conner wrote:
> It was thus said that the Great Tom Evans once stated:
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Sean Conner wrote:
>> > And really, how often is Apache restarted? On a graceful restart, it can
>> > still serve requests.
>> >
>>
>> It's clear you
It was thus said that the Great Tom Evans once stated:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Sean Conner wrote:
> > And really, how often is Apache restarted? On a graceful restart, it can
> > still serve requests.
> >
>
> It's clear you have a strong opinion on this. I prefer my mission
> critica
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Sean Conner wrote:
> And really, how often is Apache restarted? On a graceful restart, it can
> still serve requests.
>
It's clear you have a strong opinion on this. I prefer my mission
critical systems not take longer than necessary to start up, whilst
you don'
It was thus said that the Great Noel Butler once stated:
> On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 22:10 -0500, Sean Conner wrote:
> > >
> > > So its going to open, read and close 2000 files, rather than open, read
> > > and close one file, that may or may not be noticeable at
> > > startup/reloads, if I was a bett
It was thus said that the Great Tom Evans once stated:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Sean Conner wrote:
> > Nope. I just ran a program [1] that opened and read 25,018 files in 2.5
> > seconds [2]. I'd bet unnoticeable.
> >
>
> So that is an extra 5 seconds on a graceful restart - apache w
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 22:10 -0500, Sean Conner wrote:
> >
> > So its going to open, read and close 2000 files, rather than open, read
> > and close one file, that may or may not be noticeable at
> > startup/reloads, if I was a betting man, I'd say noticeable.
>
> Nope. I just ran a program [
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Sean Conner wrote:
> Nope. I just ran a program [1] that opened and read 25,018 files in 2.5
> seconds [2]. I'd bet unnoticeable.
>
So that is an extra 5 seconds on a graceful restart - apache will read
the config once, throw it away, and then read it again, so
It was thus said that the Great Noel Butler once stated:
> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 12:21 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
>
> > On 2/12/12, Steve Swift wrote:
> > > I don't think it would make a significant difference if you had a single
> > > file with 2000 vhosts, or 2000 files with one vhost each.
> >
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 12:21 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
> On 2/12/12, Steve Swift wrote:
> > I don't think it would make a significant difference if you had a single
> > file with 2000 vhosts, or 2000 files with one vhost each.
> >
>
> I think you're right, I added half a dozen test domains and c
On 2/13/12, Noel Butler wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 13:14 +, Steve Swift wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> One caveat: Don't ever rely on a a wildcard INCLUDE for the order of
>> your vhosts. This probably only matters for the first vhost, which is
>> the default for any request which doesn't match any
On 2/12/12, Steve Swift wrote:
> I don't think it would make a significant difference if you had a single
> file with 2000 vhosts, or 2000 files with one vhost each.
>
I think you're right, I added half a dozen test domains and checked
lsof, no apparent extra file handles. Just if I have to rebu
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 13:14 +, Steve Swift wrote:
>
>
>
> One caveat: Don't ever rely on a a wildcard INCLUDE for the order of
> your vhosts. This probably only matters for the first vhost, which is
> the default for any request which doesn't match any vhost.
>
>
It absolutely matters,
I don't think it would make a significant difference if you had a single
file with 2000 vhosts, or 2000 files with one vhost each.
Having them all in one file would make life easier if you needed to make a
global change.
One caveat: Don't ever rely on a a wildcard INCLUDE for the order of your
vh
Hi,
Is it more efficient for all virtualhost blocks to be in a single
file, eg httpd-vhosts.conf, or for each of them to be in their own
"one file per domain" via an include hosts.d/*.conf
We are talking a minimum of 2000 hosts per machine.
Memory I assume would be the same since it needs to know
15 matches
Mail list logo
