So we're likely dealing with mod_security overriding the response. I
haven't tinkered with that module in some time to give you a definitive
answer.
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 11:49 AM Marc wrote:
> >
> > What is returning the 500 response here? Is php/python/perl involved?
>
> No, I think this mod
>
> What is returning the 500 response here? Is php/python/perl involved?
No, I think this mod_security is generating this
> As for the scrapers, you are absolutely wasting your time customizing the
> response. I would just return a 403, actually.
I think you might be right. I did not expect to
What is returning the 500 response here? Is php/python/perl involved?
As for the scrapers, you are absolutely wasting your time customizing the
response. I would just return a 403, actually.
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 11:37 AM Marc wrote:
>
> > See the ErrorDocument directive.
>
> It does not seem
> See the ErrorDocument directive.
It does not seem to work. It looks like this config is skipped and the error is
loaded directly from the httpd binary.
ErrorDocument 500 /406.html
> Now, why is that response not suitable? And why would you respond with a
> 200 for a blocked user agent?
I t
See the ErrorDocument directive.
Now, why is that response not suitable? And why would you respond with a
200 for a blocked user agent?
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 11:26 AM Marc wrote:
> Where/how can I change this message?
>
> The server encountered an internal error or
> misconfiguration and was
Where/how can I change this message?
The server encountered an internal error or
misconfiguration and was unable to complete
your request.
Please contact the server administrator at
xxx to inform them of the time this error occurred,
and the actions you performed just before this error.
More inf
