Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.2 proxy connection pool gone missing (?)

2008-02-01 Thread Christian Folini
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 02:43:13PM +0100, Axel-Stephane SMORGRAV wrote: > Hmmm. This made me think that there may not be any point in having a min for > reverse proxy backends since it seems pretty pointless to initialise n > connections that will be closed by the backend anyway 15 seconds later

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.2 proxy connection pool gone missing (?)

2008-02-01 Thread Axel-Stephane SMORGRAV
Hmmm. This made me think that there may not be any point in having a min for reverse proxy backends since it seems pretty pointless to initialise n connections that will be closed by the backend anyway 15 seconds later or whatever the backend's keepalive timeout is, if there is no activity on sa