On Sat 12 Jan 2008, Graham Frank wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but should RLimitMem help prevent the RSS value
from going insane? I disabled my Perl script on one of the web servers
today, and after 11 hours each process got up to a RSS of 550MB each.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 4:59 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Graham Frank
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RSS of Apache Processes
On Sat 12 Jan 2008, Graham Frank wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but should RLimitMem help prevent the RSS value
from going insane
On Jan 11, 2008 3:23 AM, Graham Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also,
If it were a memory leak, as it appears to be, why do the new processes
immediately go to the high RSS values?
Let me guess: Some of the memory include in the RSS value is actually
memory that is shared by all processes.
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RSS of Apache Processes
On Jan 10, 2008 9:23 PM, Graham Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also,
If it were a memory leak, as it appears to be, why do the new processes
immediately go to the high RSS values?
Does the rss of the parent process increase as well
On Jan 10, 2008 9:23 PM, Graham Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also,
If it were a memory leak, as it appears to be, why do the new processes
immediately go to the high RSS values?
Does the rss of the parent process increase as well? That would
explain the high rss in new children.
--
Eric
of the Better Business Bureau
-Original Message-
From: Graham Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 7:18 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RSS of Apache Processes
Hi,
It looks like that's the case, yes.
Graham Frank
Neoservers
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 07:36:19PM -0600, Graham Frank wrote:
Can anyone offer up an explanation for this? Thanks.
Everything you describe is incredibly normal behaviour associated with a
memory leak :-) You can also set a maximum number of requests per child
to alleviate the problem.
Of
-Original Message-
From: Colm MacCarthaigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 8:10 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RSS of Apache Processes
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 07:36:19PM -0600, Graham Frank wrote:
Can anyone offer up an explanation
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RSS of Apache Processes
Hey,
We actually have the MaxRequestsPerChild set to 1000 and KeepAlive off.
Know of any way that we could find the leak considering the vastness of all
the possibilities?
Thanks.
Graham Frank
Neoservers LLC - Founder and Owner
Ph
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 08:18:54PM -0600, Graham Frank wrote:
We actually have the MaxRequestsPerChild set to 1000 and KeepAlive off.
That means the leak is more than 100KB per request on average, although
it could be one very bad leak :/
Know of any way that we could find the leak considering
10 matches
Mail list logo
