At 10:50 AM 1/24/2006, Eric Covener wrote:
On 1/23/06, Marty Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stymied here. Have the following VH configured:
>
>
>
> Options Indexes FollowSymLinks
> Options +Includes +ExecCGI
Is it kosher to have two Options line
On 1/23/06, Marty Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stymied here. Have the following VH configured:
>
>
>
> Options Indexes FollowSymLinks
> Options +Includes +ExecCGI
Is it kosher to have two Options lines?
Is it kosher to mix +/- and non +/- Option
> -Original Message-
> From: Marty Landman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Will look at it again this afternoon with a clearer head.
Look especially at the error_log - it will tell you *exactly* why the
request is failing...
(I did mention this earlier but you appear to have overlooked it.
At 03:17 AM 1/24/2006, Boyle Owen wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Marty Landman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 24. Januar 2006 03:30
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSI won't run unless .htaccess in sub-dir
>
> Stymied here. Have the following VH
> -Original Message-
> From: Marty Landman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Dienstag, 24. Januar 2006 03:30
> To: users@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SSI won't run unless .htaccess in sub-dir
>
> Stymied here. Have the following VH configured:
>
>
> ServerName
