On 9/10/08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09.09.08 21:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5000 reqs/sec @ 20 KB/req = 100 MB/sec = 1Gbaud. One gigabit network1
please don't mess bauds and bits per second. it's something very different.
On 9/11/08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/10/08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09.09.08 21:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5000 reqs/sec @ 20 KB/req = 100 MB/sec = 1Gbps. One gigabit network1
it's even 800, not 1000 Mbits per second...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Alexandru David Constantinescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru David Constantinescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:20 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL
On 09.09.08 21:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5000 reqs/sec @ 20 KB/req = 100 MB/sec = 1Gbaud. One gigabit network1
please don't mess bauds and bits per second. it's something very different.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baud
it's even 800, not 1000 Mbits per second...
--
Matus UHLAR -
On 9/10/08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09.09.08 21:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5000 reqs/sec @ 20 KB/req = 100 MB/sec = 1Gbaud. One gigabit network1
please don't mess bauds and bits per second. it's something very different.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baud
Why would you start out with implementing a single point of failure?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Alexandru David Constantinescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello to all
I plan to implement a proxy server for apache. The idea is to act like a
firewall, proxy , load balancer and cache. It
Evert Lammerts wrote:
Why would you start out with implementing a single point of failure?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Alexandru David Constantinescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello to all
I plan to implement a proxy server for apache. The idea is to act like a
firewall, proxy , load
How active are the sites? How complicated is the proxy configuration? Are
the Proxies an SSL termination point?
Server uptime: 50 days 3 hours 56 minutes 39 seconds
Total accesses: 36316506 - Total Traffic: 1544.5 GB
CPU Usage: u468.16 s2336.35 cu0 cs0 - .0647% CPU load
8.38 requests/sec - 373.7
Ben Spencer wrote:
How active are the sites? How complicated is the proxy configuration? Are
the Proxies an SSL termination point?
Server uptime: 50 days 3 hours 56 minutes 39 seconds
Total accesses: 36316506 - Total Traffic: 1544.5 GB
CPU Usage: u468.16 s2336.35 cu0 cs0 - .0647% CPU load
8.38
Ther is no SSL involve what so ever.
The sites are very active (it is a share hosting environment and this
is
the reason why I wanna try the proxy) and beside that we plan to
expand.
We have between 50~300 reqs/sec (depend on time of the day) with around
10~20 kb/reqs and this is not the
Ben Spencer wrote:
Ther is no SSL involve what so ever.
The sites are very active (it is a share hosting environment and this
is
the reason why I wanna try the proxy) and beside that we plan to
expand.
We have between 50~300 reqs/sec (depend on time of the day) with around
10~20 kb/reqs and this
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Alexandru David Constantinescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru David Constantinescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:20 AM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] hardware for proxy
12 matches
Mail list logo
