From: Nick Kew on Saturday, October 13, 2007 5:02 AM
On 13 Oct 2007, at 05:43, Steve Bardsley wrote:
Guys, please ignore the previous patch. There's still a problem.
It's
possibly due to cleansing of debug messages. I'll be sure we get the
next one right. Sorry for the wasted
On 13 Oct 2007, at 05:43, Steve Bardsley wrote:
Guys, please ignore the previous patch. There's still a problem. It's
possibly due to cleansing of debug messages. I'll be sure we get the
next one right. Sorry for the wasted bandwidth.
Can you supply a testcase that'll reliably reproduce the
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Steve Bardsley wrote:
[Here's a cleaned up resubmittal hoping it's more digestible.]
Is mod_deflate.c unreliable for inflating gzipped and chunked input?
Chunked is irrelevant: the dechunking
-Original Message-
From: Steve Bardsley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 6:23 PM
-Original Message-
From: Nick Kew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 5:54 AM
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Nick Kew
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Steve Bardsley wrote:
[Here's a cleaned up resubmittal hoping it's more digestible.]
Is mod_deflate.c unreliable for inflating gzipped and chunked input?
Chunked is irrelevant: the dechunking filter runs in font of mod_deflate.
It's possible there's a bug, but we don't
Nick Kew wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Steve Bardsley wrote:
[Here's a cleaned up resubmittal hoping it's more digestible.]
Is mod_deflate.c unreliable for inflating gzipped and chunked input?
Chunked is irrelevant: the dechunking filter runs in font of mod_deflate.
It's possible there's a
