On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:03 AM, ChiaTzung Liu
chiatzung@zyxel.com.tw wrote:
Hi,
My pc is installed linux-2.6.24.4, httpd-2.2.9, rp-pppoe-3.8 and ppp-2.4.4.
It connects to WAN by PPPoE, so it has both of WAN IP and LAN IP.
For example, 172.23.26.130(LAN) and 140.35.25.73(PPPoE).
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 7:27 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Overlap some content when using pppoe+httpd
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:03 AM, ChiaTzung Liu
chiatzung@zyxel.com.tw wrote:
Hi,
My
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:08 AM, ChiaTzung Liu
chiatzung@zyxel.com.tw wrote:
I used strace to watch httpd, I found it use sendfile64 to write date to
socket.
But my cpu doesn't 64bits. Does anyone know sendfile64 whether can work on
32bits cpu?
yes; sendfile64 has large file support
: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:12 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Overlap some content when using pppoe+httpd
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:08 AM, ChiaTzung Liu
chiatzung@zyxel.com.tw wrote:
I used strace to watch httpd, I found it use sendfile64 to write date
to socket.
But my
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:17 AM, ChiaTzung Liu
chiatzung@zyxel.com.tw wrote:
Oh my god.. It works if I close sendfile.
So, this means there exists some bugs in system call sendfile64..
It is much more likely to be in the lower layers of the network stack.
, 2010 11:50 PM
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Overlap some content when using pppoe+httpd
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:17 AM, ChiaTzung Liu
chiatzung@zyxel.com.tw wrote:
Oh my god.. It works if I close sendfile.
So, this means there exists some bugs in system call sendfile64