Re: Winnt mpm user ThreadsPerChild feed back

2008-12-12 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 4:08 AM, killbulle wrote: >> i my case i juste know that 250 is two low( i receive you should consider >> raising Threadperchild) and the cpu load was low at this time..., >> in fact my question is more is 250 a good default for server class machine >> who server jk and sta

Re: Winnt mpm user ThreadsPerChild feed back

2008-12-12 Thread killbulle
r feeback on this list > regards marc > > -- > Eric Covener > cove...@gmail.com > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: Winnt mpm user ThreadsPerChild feed back

2008-12-12 Thread killbulle
mail.com > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/W

Re: Winnt mpm user ThreadsPerChild feed back

2008-12-11 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:25 PM, killbulle wrote: > > Hi the list, > i have a windows apache 2.0.63 install, > and i like to size correctly this value for my production machine 2GB/dual > core serving static and jk stream > is there a rule for sizing winnt mpm You need one thread for each concurr

Winnt mpm user ThreadsPerChild feed back

2008-12-11 Thread killbulle
very high value for the thread perchild like 1800 but i'am looking for user feedback regards Marc -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Winnt-mpm-user-ThreadsPerChild-feed-back-tp20964443p20964443.html Sent from the Apache HTTP Server - Users mailing list archive at