Re: IPv6 forwarding and routing in linux

2005-03-30 Thread Pedro Tomé
No, I didn't setup a PPP link. When I said pont-to-point connection, I was trying to say that I've connected two machines that route packets between themselves directly (like in ipv4 when I say that AP is via eth0 with netmask closed 255.255.255.255). In this case is equivalent to saying that

Re: Commercial IPv6 service via tunnel?

2005-03-30 Thread Miguel Angel Diaz
Why don't you try http://tb4.consulintel.euro6ix.org/in/index.php? You can get from there a /48 tunnel-based if required. Regards Miguel - Original Message - From: Lawrence Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@ipv6.org Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:37 AM Subject: Commercial IPv6

Re: IPv6 forwarding and routing in linux

2005-03-30 Thread Ed Kapitein
Hi Pedro, I cut and paste some of your output and comment in between AP stuff: result of ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:01:29:D0:8B:59 inet addr:172.20.72.4 Bcast:172.20.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 You ipv4 netmask and broadcast are not correct. this has nothing to

Linux radvd

2005-03-30 Thread Bellino, Phil
Hello, I am running radvd on a linux server and it is sending router advertisements to FF02::1. The prefix it is sending is 3ffe:302:11:2:: I have a linux host node running 2.6.11 with the following output from ifconfig: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:9C:00:08:AD inet

Re: Linux radvd

2005-03-30 Thread Michael Banta
May be silly, but you have radvd advertising through eth0 correct? When I first tried I had it advertsing on the wrong interface. I would think that eth0 should have a global address assigned to it. You only have a link-local address on it (fe80). I think you should have one of the global