--On Wednesday, March 30, 2005 12:25:01 AM +0100 Pedro Tomé
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all!
> I'm developing a micro-mobility protocol in an IPv6 network for my
> final degree project but I'm having some problems using IPv6.
>
> Imagine the following, simple, situation:
> I'm connecting
Hi Pedro,
I think that there is something wrong with the routing tables on you machine.
perhaps you can send the output of ifconfig and ip -6 route show to the
list, so we can take a closer look.
Besides that, did you really mean to use a 2000::/3 addres? that seems
like a rather big chunk of addr
- Original Message -
From: "Pedro Tomé" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 1:25 AM
Subject: IPv6 forwarding and routing in linux
> Hello all!
> I'm developing a micro-mobility protocol in an IPv6 network for my
> final degree project but I'm having some problems usi
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:30:52 +0200 (CEST), Ed Kapitein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> I think that there is something wrong with the routing tables on you machine.
> perhaps you can send the output of ifconfig and ip -6 route show to the
> list, so we can take a closer look.
GW stuff
No, I didn't setup a PPP link. When I said pont-to-point connection, I
was trying to say that I've connected two machines that route packets
between themselves directly (like in ipv4 when I say that AP is via
eth0 with netmask closed 255.255.255.255).
In this case is equivalent to saying that AP_IP
Why don't you try http://tb4.consulintel.euro6ix.org/in/index.php?
You can get from there a /48 tunnel-based if required.
Regards
Miguel
- Original Message -
From: "Lawrence Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 4:37 AM
Subject: Commercial IPv6 service via tu
Hello,
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:12:32 +0200, Peter Bieringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --On Wednesday, March 30, 2005 12:25:01 AM +0100 Pedro Tomé
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello all!
> > I'm developing a micro-mobility protocol in an IPv6 network for my
> > final degree project b
Title: Duplicate Address Dedection of IPv6 over WLAN
Hi, has anybody experience with
IPv6 over WLAN and its interworking with Duplicate
Address Dedection ?
To my mind in an infrastructure network the accesspoint will
loop back the multicast - neighbor solicitations to the sending stat
Hi Pedro,
I cut and paste some of your output and comment in between
>
>AP stuff:
>result of ifconfig
>eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:01:29:D0:8B:59
> inet addr:172.20.72.4 Bcast:172.20.255.255
>Mask:255.255.255.0
You ipv4 netmask and broadcast are not correct. this has nothin
Hello,
I am running radvd on a linux server and it is sending router advertisements
to FF02::1.
The prefix it is sending is 3ffe:302:11:2::
I have a linux host node running 2.6.11 with the following output from
ifconfig:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:9C:00:08:AD
inet addr:
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 08:24 -0500, Bellino, Phil wrote:
> Hello,
> I am running radvd on a linux server and it is sending router advertisements
> to FF02::1.
> The prefix it is sending is 3ffe:302:11:2::
> Now, I can ping to other "fe80" nodes on my net as well as other tunnel
> hosts on my net, s
I changed the IP addr of the AP to /3 instead of /128...it was a
stupid distraction that made me do that...after that, the problem of
the ping GW -> AP with the src addr = link local was resolved...the AP
uses his global address now!
And I can now enable forwarding in the AP that the ping's still
May be silly, but you have radvd advertising through eth0 correct? When
I first tried I had it advertsing on the wrong interface.
I would think that eth0 should have a global address assigned to it.
You only have a link-local address on it (fe80).
I think you should have one of the global /64
13 matches
Mail list logo
