Do we think that Isis should require that public methods be annotated as
@Action in order to be picked up? Put another way, that @Programmatic is
assumed unless @Action is specified?
Maybe we could introduce a configuration property to make this
configurable, with the default currently as is?
Th
It seems a small detail, but having the explicit use of @Action probably
would be better. I often have to add @Programmatic to make unexpected
things go from the UI, its not the focus and so you forget it.
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Dan Haywood
wrote:
> Do we think that Isis should require
+1
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stephen Cameron [mailto:steve.cameron...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 9. Oktober 2017 12:49
An: users@isis.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Quartz | ISIS Metamodel Validation errors
It seems a small detail, but having the explicit use of @Action probably would
be
+1
Vladimir
Am 09.10.2017 12:56 schrieb "Rade, Joerg / Kuehne + Nagel / Ham GI-DP" <
joerg.r...@kuehne-nagel.com>:
> +1
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Stephen Cameron [mailto:steve.cameron...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 9. Oktober 2017 12:49
> An: users@isis.apache.org
> Betreff
Hi Dan,
For me the problem was to identify the rit cause. Validation errors do not
point to the actual domain service under question.
You suggestion is very good and could save lot of time and I think it will
also fix issue of seeing unwanted buttons like create, update, etc.
Thanks,
Jayesh
On
