Re: Multiple build problems on simpleapp-archetype on Java 1.7

2016-03-07 Thread Dan Haywood
by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: java.util.function.Consumer >> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:366) >> at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:355) >> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) >

RE: Multiple build problems on simpleapp-archetype on Java 1.7

2016-03-07 Thread Dan Haywood
425) > at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:308) > at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:358) > ... 40 more > > > Thanks so much for everything. > > > -Original Message- > From: Diego [mailto:longsto...

RE: Multiple build problems on simpleapp-archetype on Java 1.7

2016-03-07 Thread Nacho Cánovas Rejón
rom: Diego [mailto:longsto...@gmail.com] Sent: domingo, 28 de febrero de 2016 14:59 To: users@isis.apache.org Subject: Re: Multiple build problems on simpleapp-archetype on Java 1.7 Hi guys, thanks a lot. @Kevin Good suggestion I tried but I'm having hard luck installing two parallel JDK on my

Re: Multiple build problems on simpleapp-archetype on Java 1.7

2016-02-28 Thread Diego
Hi guys, thanks a lot. @Kevin Good suggestion I tried but I'm having hard luck installing two parallel JDK on my windows 10 box, as in [1] (still working on the suggested solution) and besides I want to use 1.7 (hoping to introduce Isis on my company which is not on Java 8 by now). On the mailing

Re: Multiple build problems on simpleapp-archetype on Java 1.7

2016-02-28 Thread Dan Haywood
Hi Diego, OK, so I just tried this out, and you are right that there is a slight issue trying to compile the code under JDK 1.7, but it's easy enough to work around. basically, where you are getting the compile exceptions, change the code to cast to the raw type, eg: @Override public Li

Re: Multiple build problems on simpleapp-archetype on Java 1.7

2016-02-27 Thread Kevin Meyer
Hi Diego and welcome! Please could you try installing the JDK for Java 1.8 and try again? When I was testing the 1.11 release I found that JDK 1.8 was required. If you have issues with the enforcer plugin configuration, just remove that stanza from the generated pom.xml. Cheers, Kevin On 27