Re: Jackrabbit UI Tool

2006-09-12 Thread JavaJ
Torgeir Veimo wrote: > > > On 24 Aug 2006, at 00:30, JavaJ wrote: > >> >> Is there some kind of tool available that will allow you to inspect >> and >> traverse your repository through a UI, like inspect nodes, >> properties, node >> types? > > Are you looking for desktop or HTML based?

Re: Performance problem with references

2006-09-12 Thread Tobias Bocanegra
no, only if you alter the references pointing to NodeX. On 9/12/06, Michael Neale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: right, so saving a document, which itself has only one reference, causes ALL the references of NodeX to be updated/saved? On 9/12/06, Christoph Kiehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mic

Re: Performance problem with references

2006-09-12 Thread Michael Neale
right, so saving a document, which itself has only one reference, causes ALL the references of NodeX to be updated/saved? On 9/12/06, Christoph Kiehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Michael Neale wrote: > I gather you are referring to saving the node that has all the > references as > attributes?

Re: Performance problem with references

2006-09-12 Thread Christoph Kiehl
Michael Neale wrote: I gather you are referring to saving the node that has all the references as attributes? ie: NodeA ---> NodeX * Where there are 100 000 NodeX instances. NodeX.getReferences() would then return just one NodeA (in this case). No, my scenario is the following: NodeA * --

Re: Performance problem with references

2006-09-12 Thread Michael Neale
I gather you are referring to saving the node that has all the references as attributes? ie: NodeA ---> NodeX * Where there are 100 000 NodeX instances. NodeX.getReferences() would then return just one NodeA (in this case). So when you save NodeA - you are saving all the references - and I woul

Re: Performance problem with references

2006-09-12 Thread Tobias Bocanegra
currently the referencing is not optimized at all. your results are expected. using UUIDs or paths as references is a valid alternative, although the Node.getReferences() is more expensive since you need to use the query. regards, toby On 9/11/06, Christoph Kiehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,