Re: QueryObjectModel: FulltextSearch on subnodes

2008-02-06 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Benjamin Papez wrote: Hello Marcel, thank you very much for the solution. Do you have an idea, when joins will be supported in the JQOM2LuceneQueryBuilder ? there's no exact date, but the latest when JSR 283 is final and public. jackrabbit will again be the basis for the reference implementa

Re: QueryObjectModel: FulltextSearch on subnodes

2008-01-30 Thread Benjamin Papez
Hello Marcel, thank you very much for the solution. Do you have an idea, when joins will be supported in the JQOM2LuceneQueryBuilder ? Regards, Benjamin On 21.01.2008 10:41 Marcel Reutegger wrote: Hi Benjamin, the QueryObjectModel in jackrabbit is work in progress and not usable in it's cu

Re: QueryObjectModel: FulltextSearch on subnodes

2008-01-21 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Benjamin, the QueryObjectModel in jackrabbit is work in progress and not usable in it's current state. the equivalent JQOM to your query would be: qf.createQuery( qf.join( qf.selector("nt:file", "f"), qf.selector("nt:resource", "r"), qf.JOIN_TYPE_INNER, qf.sameNodeJoinCon

QueryObjectModel: FulltextSearch on subnodes

2008-01-18 Thread Benjamin Papez
Hello, I am already testing with your JSR283 QueryObjectModel implementation and have a question regarding the proper usage. The XPATH query, which I try to implement with the JQOM is: //element(*,nt:file)[jcr:contains(jcr:content,'Test')] Internally it results in a Lucene query: +(_:PROPE

QueryObjectModel: FulltextSearch on subnodes

2008-01-18 Thread Benjamin Papez
Hello, I am already testing with your JSR283 QueryObjectModel implementation and have a question regarding the proper usage. The XPATH query, which I try to implement with the JQOM is: //element(*,nt:file)[jcr:contains(jcr:content,'Test')] Internally it results in a Lucene query: +(_:PROPE