Re: using or in sparql

2012-09-10 Thread Francesco Panico
Hi Your query selects all triples without source, at first. If the two elements without author have a source they will be discarded, because the value added by optional clause have to respect where clauses anyway. You should try to use UNION construct, because you want to retrieve a list with

Re: using or in sparql

2012-09-10 Thread Katja Siegemund
Hi Francesco, thanks a lot, it's working now, I also had to use SELECT DISTINCT to prevent duplicates. The W3C Rec. for SPARQL is quite un-understandable in some cases ;) Cheers, Katja Am 10.09.2012 12:29, schrieb Francesco Panico: Hi Your query selects all triples without source, at

Re: using or in sparql

2012-09-10 Thread Katja Siegemund
Hm, well, but how can I use UNION for multiple times? I have a lot of or's in my query :( Am 10.09.2012 12:29, schrieb Francesco Panico: Hi Your query selects all triples without source, at first. If the two elements without an author have a source, they will be discarded, because the

Re: using or in sparql

2012-09-10 Thread Katja Siegemund
Oh that's good! Thanks, I'll try this out. Especially minus seems more convenient :) Am 10.09.2012 13:53, schrieb Andy Seaborne: On 10/09/12 12:16, Magnus Stuhr wrote: Hi, I just mocked up a template really quick, but something like this should work: SELECT ?s WHERE { { { ?s ?p ?o. FILTER

Re: Merge from Remote named graph and local RDF file

2012-09-10 Thread Frank Lee
Hi, Andy,  The error code went away after I updated Fuseki/TDB to the latest version. Thanks a lot.  Also, merging the local RDF file (containing measurement data) into the remote existing named graph has been successfully completed. Again, thanks for warm help.  One last question. Can we

Re: SDB and concurrent update

2012-09-10 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 10/09/12 20:40, Lebling, David (US SSA) wrote: Andy Seabourne suggested I try the SDB 1.3.5 release candidate once JENA-118 was identified as a likely culprit. Here are my findings so far. The tl;dr version is that JENA-118 seems to be fixed but I still have a few comments and questions.

Re: LARQ prefix search results missing hits

2012-09-10 Thread Paolo Castagna
Hi Osma On 28/08/12 14:22, Osma Suominen wrote: Hi Paolo! Thanks a lot for the fix! I have tested the latest snapshot and it now works as expected. At least until I add lots of new data and hit the new limit :) You're of course right about the search use case. I think the problem here is