I have a repeating memory leak in TDB in my web application (
https://github.com/jmvanel/semantic_forms/blob/master/scala/forms_play/README.md
).
It is caching RDF documents from internet, typically dbpedia ressources.
It is not the use case described in "Fuseki/TDB memory leak for concurrent
upda
Dear Andy and All,
sorry for this long thread.
I am sure I was not able to put in practice some of your suggestions.
I put the full code here http://collabedit.com/wfhtq and reported below.
I tested it over the Q1 with the triple (?boss ex:isBossOf ?ind).
=== BEFORE Q1:
PREFIX rdfs:
Hi,
I've run into a problem involving a SPARQL query that takes parameters
as a VALUES block (from the skos-history project [1]). The query works
differently in Jena 3.0.1+ than it used to. I believe this may be
related to variable scoping fixes made as part of JENA-1018.
The original query
Osma,
Please try the reference query engine (add "--engine=ref" to the command
line).
It naively executes queries bottom up, with no optimization.
At first look, ?type inside GRAPH is out of scope of the VALUES clause.
So at:
COALESCE(?type, ?defaulttype)
?type in undef
The VALUE and GRAP
Hi Andy!
Thanks for confirming my suspicion.
I tried --engine=ref. With 3.0.1 the result doesn't change, i.e.
ex:TypeA will still be used. With 3.0.0 the result changes into that as
well. So the behavior is indeed caused by a perhaps inappropriate
optimization in <3.0.1.
I will move the VAL
> On Feb 3, 2016, at 5:13 AM, Jean-Marc Vanel wrote:
>
> In the documentation,
>
> https://jena.apache.org/documentation/tdb/tdb_transactions.html#multi-threaded-use
>
> it is not clear which use pattern is preferred and the reason why.
The first pattern shows a single dataset object being sha
I think that the second pattern "create a dataset object on the thread", or
rather in my case
"create a dataset object for one HTTP request"
is worth trying.
And I want to know why the doc seems to prefer the first pattern.
2016-02-03 18:30 GMT+01:00 A. Soroka :
> > On Feb 3, 2016, at 5:13 AM, J
I forgot to mention that I'm still using Jena 2.13.0 , due to Banana-RDF
not having updated.
2016-02-03 18:43 GMT+01:00 Jean-Marc Vanel :
> I think that the second pattern "create a dataset object on the thread",
> or rather in my case
> "create a dataset object for one HTTP request"
> is worth
How can I run fuseki 2.3.x on a remote server and
allow full access to anyone who knows the IP address?
This is all that's in my shiro.ini file:
[urls]
## or to allow any access.
/$/** = anon
# Everything else
/**=anon
Anonymous users can go to http://xx.xx.xx.xx:3030
but they do not have
On 02/02/16 14:03, Massimiliano Ricci wrote:
Great!!
When do you think to release Fuseki 2.4.0?
Jena usually releases every 6 months.
There's a dev build if you want to test before the release
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/jena/
(make sure you get t
Hi there -
"memory leak" has possible several meaning, not sure which you you mean:
* RAM usage is growing?
* Disk usage is growing?
* a specific file (the journal is growing)?
What is the pattern of transactions? (how many, do they overlap?)
Andy
On 03/02/16 17:47, Jean-Marc Vanel wr
Ok. For some reason there's a file named shiro.ini in the top-level
directory but it is not used. The shiro.ini file
that's used is in the "fun" directory. Why is there a shiro.ini file
in the top-level directory if it is not used for
anything?
J
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Jason Levitt wro
12 matches
Mail list logo
