"ARQ Rewards Queries"? "Always Reify Qarefully"? ;)
Maybe it had something to do with "arc" as in an element of a graph?
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
> On Oct 9, 2016, at 2:31 PM, Claude Warren wrote:
>
> I thought it was Andy's RDF Queryengine ;)
>
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 a
I thought it was Andy's RDF Queryengine ;)
On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> If ARQ ever stood for anything, that has been lost in the mists of time.
>
> ARQ is ARQ. It does not stand for anything.
>
> Andy
>
> On 08/10/16 23:40, Kumar,Abhishek wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>
If ARQ ever stood for anything, that has been lost in the mists of time.
ARQ is ARQ. It does not stand for anything.
Andy
On 08/10/16 23:40, Kumar,Abhishek wrote:
Hi all,
What is the expansion of the acronym ARQ - the query engine for Jena?
Thanks & Regards
Abhishek
On 08/10/16 22:15, Darko Androcec wrote:
Hi,
I have got this suggestion on StackOverFlow:
"OWL max cardinality is not a restriction on the datatype as you already
recognized. What you're after is known as OWL data range, in particular,
FacetRestriction: w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Data_Ranges . Note
Hi Lorenz,
On 09/10/16 13:18, Lorenz B. wrote:
What Dave means is that the InfModel contains some "trivial" facts that
are always true for the given entailment regime and simply exist in this
model. If you write the InfModel to disk, then those facts are also
written to disk.
@Dave: I know that
yes because what I studied about SUM is it sum the values of single
variable.
SELECT (?worldcupgoals + ?eurogoals+ ?othergoals))
where { ?team rdf:type ont:Team . ?team ont:WorldCup_Goals ?worldcupgoals;
ont:EuroCup_Goals ?eurogoals ; ont:Other_Goals ?othergoals}
On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 5:15 AM, L
What Dave means is that the InfModel contains some "trivial" facts that
are always true for the given entailment regime and simply exist in this
model. If you write the InfModel to disk, then those facts are also
written to disk.
@Dave: I know that there was an option to ignore those "trivial"
sta
No, that's obviously wrong. And you don't need GROUP BY and SUM - in
your examples it's even the wrong way.
Simply SELECT the team and use '+' to compute the sum of the different
goal values.
And why can't you try it out?
> Will it works like:
>
> SELECT (SUM(?worldcupgoals ?eurogoals ?othergoals
