That depends a good bit on what you want to say about your graphs. One way to
think about this kind of question is: with whom will you want to _share_
information about your graphs? If you are just recording this for your own
internal purposes and you can keep your assertions minimal (e.g.
> You import LOV-1 and LOV-2 into different graphs, so they will have
> different graph URIs and all the quads will be distinct (even if some of
> the triples in the two graphs are the same).
>
> Dave
Thank you.
Last question: if I'm going to make my own graph to describe what graphs I've
On 10/04/17 11:44, Laura Morales wrote:
Oh I see, basically I have to create my own graph describing where
originated from. This makes perfect sense.
There is however another problem that comes to mind, although this is strictly
theoretical because I don't have this problem in practice
Oh I see, basically I have to create my own graph describing where
originated from. This makes perfect sense.
There is however another problem that comes to mind, although this is strictly
theoretical because I don't have this problem in practice (yet). Let's say I
want to import the datasets
On 10/04/17 09:36, Laura Morales wrote:
I'm trying to import the LOV dataset into Fuseki. LOV is basically a collection of
dictionaries, so each tuple already has a label (the dictionary it belongs to). Now, in
my dataset I already have other graphs (graph-1, graph-2, etc...) but I'd like to
I'm trying to import the LOV dataset into Fuseki. LOV is basically a collection
of dictionaries, so each tuple already has a label (the dictionary it belongs
to). Now, in my dataset I already have other graphs (graph-1, graph-2, etc...)
but I'd like to tag all quads from the LOV dataset with
